Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,095
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    127

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Probably right on TOR, but TOR is up on us by 2.4. Paredes is 2.3. The Yanks are up 1.9 and may add someone else, if they miss out on Bellinger. (Word is they are shopping Chisholm 3.5, so...)
  2. Agreed, but HOU is not in rebuild mode, so maybe a third team needs to be involved. We'd still have our OF & DH logjam, but Duran's bat would still be here. I'm not sure who that 3rd team is who gets our prospects and gives HOU an OF'er or SP. If HOU took K Campbell for Paredes it would not upset the line-up, but might bite us in the butt, later on.
  3. I'm pretty sure the Yanks will add a big plus player, too, and one never knows with TOR.
  4. Once again, you make a good point. Going by projections for just 2026 (not the 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 years more...) 2026 3.9 Gray 3.3 Suarez 1.9 Contreras 1.2 Oviedo Total: 10.3 Subtract Oviedo, because we'd have probably done that anyway: 9.1 ___________________ 4.0 Bregman 2.6 Alonso Total 6.6 ____________________ 4.0 Bregman 3.1 Schwarber Total: 7.1 ______________________ I'm not claiming I like what we did more than Alonso or Schwarber plus Bregman, but we spent a lot of AAV (over less years) and seemingly got a lot more 2026 value the way we've gone, so far. If we can trade for Paredes (2.3) but it will mean we trade away some projected value in return. Now, for once, we got someone else to pay down a contract (Gray,) but here is the AAV breakdown: 26 Suarez + 21 Gray + 21 Contreras= 68 vs 31 Alonso + 31 Bregman= 62
  5. Spo has $4.1M for pre-arb
  6. But why keep 6 OF'ers?
  7. 8 years left on his deal, and he's half way to 34, now. YIKES! BTV has him at -118, but his value is +180. BTV accepted Yoshida, Hicks, Sandoval for Machado & $70M
  8. Yes, I can't see there being a reason to move him to 2B, despite our enormous need there.
  9. I don't see Campbell at 2B in 2026. I think they want to see how he looks in LF, but unless we trade someone, KC will be blocked by not 3 but 4 OF'ers. We won't have KC riding the bench, so it's a near FT role on the big club or see how he looks in AAA. If we add no infielder, this could be the infield: 1B: Contreras FT 2B: Romy/DHam v R/ Romy v L 3B: Mayer FT SS: Story FT
  10. SPOTRAC has our tax number at $276M. $284M Line 3 (2nd surcharge) $304M Line4 (3rd surcharge) We may try to keep around $3-8M for deadline or in season deals, although we've been shedding more salary in season than adding it, lately (thanks to Devers.) There has been some talk of trading some of these players (listed by current AAV tax hit to the Sox.) $18M Yoshida $10.3M Hicks $9.2M Bello $9.1 Sandoval $7.8 Duran $7.5M Campbell $6.3M Rafaela $4.1M Houck $2.8M Crawford $1.6M Casas
  11. The .313 OBP from 2023 to 2025 is very concerning, as i was .334 before 2023. I'm okay with Ks, if a guy can produce, but I'm not sure all the extra base hits make up for the low OBP. I'm big on OBP, although it seems to be losing steam. That being said, Suarez would not have the worst OBP on the team. That's not a prop. Story .308, Rafaela .295, Narvaez .306 & Toro .289 all were worse than ES's 3 year number. Abreu .317 & Campbell .319 were close. I'd much rather have Paredes, but trading Duran or Bello to get him kinda cancels out that gain over Suarez. I'm not going to project what the spending budget is, and if we trade some salary, maybe ES can fit. Wo else, besides Paredes gives us some power we need? If we can keep Duran and add Paredes power, I'd be pretty happy.
  12. He did play in college and a few games in the minors, but I'd give it a big NO!
  13. I might add DHam or Mullins, if that tips the balance...maybe Sandlin.
  14. If we trade Duran, he could DH, at least eventually. I get the problem with signing him, but until I see Paredes in the headlines, I'm looking for other options to boost our offense.
  15. Not with Cora as manager, unless Brez trades DHam or keeps him at AAA.
  16. That was my point. They don't have all those 4 anymore, not WC.
  17. On E Suarez, it might also be about the money, the 3rd tax line and a willingness to defer salary.
  18. Other than Paredes, he might be the best option to fill the need on offense for a power RH'd bat. Yes, he might be the worst defensive choice.
  19. I heard somewhere there was talk of it. Can't find a link.
  20. I have spoken about the need to upgrade the offense as part of the idea of trading Duran. Sign E Suarez and then trade Duran for a 2Bman that can hit plus maybe a decent RP'er. Or, trade Duran for Paredes, BKing and Janek.
  21. That's fine. I read somewhere that STL was fine with his catcher defense but were just logjammed there, last year. They had plans to use him at catcher in 2026 before the trade. That being said, we do not want Contreras acting as the FT catcher for any long period of time, but he could carry the load until we sign someone, of add a catcher in AAA to the 40. I do not think we need to have another catcher on the 40 to start the season. We just need a guy at AAA that is capable of being promoted as a fill-in. Is Jason Delay good enough? I doubt Rosario or Lira fit the bill.
  22. I'd still like to see JH spend more, and E Suarez would be a nice addition, but I can understand wanting to trade some salary to keep us under the 3rd line, if we do sign Geno. (Duran 9, Bello 9 or Sandoval 9 might be enough.)
×
×
  • Create New...