That's funny.
You used to deny you were a Bloom basher.
I criticized Bloom many times.
I defended Bloom more times, for sure, because so many lack of context attacks were made by you and "your legion of bashers."
Yes, I was optimistic when we hired him that he could do what was most needed. I thought he'd be better at finding "gems in the rough" as he was, although he did find a few. (I've said that phrase over and over, but you and others only see a counter to your baseless or faulty attacks as a sign of support.
It is your fatal flaw. If someone disagrees with your attack, we must support the other side.
Everything is black and white, to you.
I've taken part in discussions about what grade he deserves long before his firing. My grades for him were not out of line with most others, even those who wanted him out very soon after he was hired. The guy who wanted him out before he was even hired hardly ever gave a grade, except to hard on wins and losses and how "the majority of fans see it that way." (Like that matters, at all.)
You don't value farm and foundation building, like I do. That is fine, but that doesn't mean I think Bloom did a good job at building winning teams. He didn't. The team played about .500 ball under him. I gave that a C- or D+. I said I was fine with people giving him a D or D- for that. I didn't just say that after he was fired, either.
I do think the rest of his work should be part of his final grade, and I gave him better grades for farm building and foundation/budget aspects than others, and was clear to point out that the farm grade was purely speculative. If that sounds like a supporter, you need to look up what supporter means.
I think he deserved to be fired.
I provided the link on Bloom's hiring for you to go back and look.