Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

SoxnCycles

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by SoxnCycles

  1. So, you were lying when you said you didn't consider "homer' as an insult, because you obviously used it to get back at someone who dared call you a traditionalist. Idiot.
  2. For an old guy, AH700 can move a goalpost with the best of them.
  3. More like a Cadillac with a slipping transmission. Not a great investment, but probably fixable. I think the big mistake was signing both Hanley AND Pablo. They should have signed one or the other and filled either 3B or LF with a lower cost option. The Sox got a little too greedy.
  4. Sounds like definitions you made up. Seeing as there are no references cited, I'm betting you did.
  5. I get the "helps deal with the grind of a long season" part, but what do greenies do for day-to-day performance?
  6. You do realize you're ripping the basic strategy of a team that made it to the World Series, right? Almost every team has flaws somewhere, whether it be defense, offense, pitching, or some combination of them. The fact that they made it to the WS tells me they have some idea of what they're doing. They had flaws and made the best use of what they had, a handful of anecdotal plays aside.
  7. If they're going to vote in "known" steroid users, they'll need to take a close look at their careers. You could argue that Bonds was a great player before he decided to cheat. McGwire, not so much. Personally, I'm ok with not letting blatant users in.
  8. I don't think that's limited to former posters. I do think a lot of members, here and on other boards, enjoy watching a good fight more than they want to admit. Glad to see you can be honest about it.
  9. Which is why I stay. I fit right in.
  10. Just the Three Stooges here. Coincidentally, the "new' versions are about the same age as the originals.
  11. Aww, is your ignore button not working today? lol Truth hurts , I guess.
  12. Yeah, the old cranks on this board are in a huge rush to adopt analytics. LOL
  13. Have you got control over the ads on this site? Can you check them for malware before they are added to the site? Exploit kits are usually within a malicious fake ad, and they are bad news for a PC.
  14. The heroes on this board love to attack Kimmi because they know she's too nice to tell them what she really thinks. Gutless turds.
  15. I suppose I could use the collective "they" that's so popular with the passive-agressive types here.
  16. I'll try not to be as subtle next time.
  17. And how does one put a dollar value on what was given up for said players? Dude.
  18. If you say so...
  19. That's only 4.8 mil per win for the new guys. Sounds like a real bargain.
  20. LOL If things were really that bad, Jesus Christ couldn't fix it, never mind DD.
  21. The best part is he puts people on ignore for insulting him, when he does it on a daily basis. Can you add "Biggest Candyass Award" to your voting thread?
  22. Yeah, can't say I'm all excited about a mercenary like Boggs getting his number retired. That's one pre-game ceremony I won't mind missing.
  23. Gee, I thought the Sox finishing last was all BCs fault... As for whining about what topics are beaten to death, you guys should be thankful posters like Kimmi and Pal are willing to put with the abuse and buck the "We're miserable so we have to blame someone" crowd. This place would a f***ing morgue without them. You'd have A700 constantly posting "(fill in the blank) sucks" to no one in particular and the suck ups posting "You're absolutely right!" MVP, if you're tired of the Cherrington talk, quit bitching and start a new conversation.
  24. You set a very low bar for yourself. Aim higher!
×
×
  • Create New...