Kimmi
-
Posts
27,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kimmi
-
That may be the case, but Maddon is another one of those self-important twits.
-
In Kimbrel's defense, what happened in the postseason is one of those small sample size random things. I would not use that as any type of gauge as to whether to re-sign him or not. There are other factors that would keep me from re-signing him, but not his postseason woes.
-
I also believe that he has something up his sleeve. I just hope it doesn't involve trading someone like Jackie or Porcello for relief help. Then again, I might be pleasantly surprised by the return.
-
What problem?
-
Yes, he can probably get a guaranteed starting job with some team. Also, I'm not sure he would want to come back, even if he had a good opportunity with the Sox. He may have some hard feelings after being traded, though I have not read anything to that extent.
-
I agree Hitch.
-
Maybe Dave is legitimately becoming desperate.
-
Meh, I'm not a fan of signing a suspended PED user.
-
It may be cyclic to a certain extent, but I don't believe that it's cyclic to the point where a team should go from a top 3 farm system to a bottom 3 farm system in less than 3 years. I can see going from a top 3 to maybe middle of the pack, due the cyclic nature of the circumstances.
-
I do not argue the point that Dombrowski job of rebuilding the farm will be more difficult than Ben's job was due to the circumstances. That really wasn't my point though.
-
Everyone on the 2004 Red Sox team had lifetime passes. Damon chose to sell his to the Evil Empire.
-
On this, we agree.
-
All I'm saying is that it's possible to do, especially when spending money like the Red Sox have done.
-
Some teams have tanked in order to build their strong farm system. We did not have to do that in order to build our strong farm system. We had a strong farm in place, along with a strong core of MLB ready players. It was not necessary to destroy the farm in order to build a championship team.
-
You do not weaken the starting rotation to strengthen the pen. The only way I can see one of our top 5 starters moving to the pen is if injury concerns dictate it.
-
I will say this. The way that Jacko talks about our cliff coming almost makes me believe that it is not coming.
-
Are those two things mutually exclusive?
-
Well played, on both parts.
-
Exactly. I can't remember specifically what was said about giving Vazquez the nod in the postseason, but IIRC, it was something they really liked about his pitch calling and his openness to changing things up.
-
The focus is not only on them. I would gladly take any similar pitchers for similar types of deals. That said, I do believe Buchholz has more potential than many of the other depth type signings out there.
-
On the flip side of things, could our current superstars, like Mookie and Trout, go back to Babe's era and be as good as they are today? You can't be too sure about that either.
-
So, it's possible to build a contender and still have a strong farm system. Interesting.
-
Woot! We broke the top 100. We are moving up in the world!
-
The Sox have no more of a glaring hole in their pen than the Yankees have in their rotation. As I've said before, I rather have a strong rotation and a mediocre pen than a strong pen and a mediocre rotation.
-
The Yanks are fine offensively. Their weakness will be in their starting pitching.
