Are you saying that Beltron will play the OF and Nava 1B? Or Nava OF and Beltran 1B?
My gut says the Sox will not land Beltran ... too old and too expensive. Great hitter though.
I am referring to Trouts first partial year of MLB action ... compare to JBJ's first partial year. You cannot take anything from JBJ's first partial year. His minor league numbers have more significance.
Tanaka may choose which team with all things being equal. What club it going to allow Tanaka to take a lower offer ... that would be money that the club looses out on not Tanaka.
UN is correct ... this critical view of JBJ is unwarranted ... as I said many times ... go look up the stats for Mike Trout. JBJ already showed that he can play CF ... we won games against some really good teams with Drew batting .083. Worse case senario JBJ is our .083 hitter and we still win games. There is absolutely no indication that JBJ will not post an OBP of .340 or higher especially at the back of the order. Why fork over 20M when you can get the job done for 500K. To be honest I do not think that Ellsbury is in the Sox plans ... they will not come out and say it because Ellsbury is very popular with the fan base. If JBJ did not exist well that is a horse of a different color.
You only know you love her when you let her go.
You are right mvp ... unless teams are running wild against the Sox give Lavarnway a shot ... I cannot imagine that he is that much of a defensive liability compared to Salty. Let Ross stay on and catch 2 of 5 games. I am all in on JBJ
LF - Stanton
CF - JBJ
RF - Vic
1B - Naps
2B - we can find someone to play 2B
SS - Bogaerts
3B - WMB
C - Lavarnway
DH - Big Papi
SP - Tanaka - had to put that in.
Lineup
Victorino
Pedoria
Stanton
Ortiz
Napoli
Bogaerts
Middlebrooks
Lavarnway
JBJ
Can Stanton play 1B eventually?
So the theory behind the opt-out clause is that the player gives you his very best in those 5 years so that he can make a bigger contract over the last 5.
Stanton has high upside no doubt. Could not Florida do a Sign & Trade type of deal. Extend Stanton for 10 years @ 100M and then trade for players & prospects? He is making 500K now ... it would be hard to pass on 100M of guaranteed money especially with his recent injuries.
I am not feeling that type of deal. What you are saying is that if he preforms as forecast he gets to opt-out but if he sucks then he gets paid anyway. What am I missing here?
Talking about Webster. Upon 2nd thought you are correct. He will improve his control and go on to have a great career with Boston so we can really rub it in to the Dodgers fans.
Dodgers are favorites to win WS in 2014. There is a good reason for this as they are oozing with talent. Listed in order of value:
1. Kershaw
2. Han Ram
3. Kemp
4. Puig
5. Greinke
6. Gonzo