Obviously you have to make good draft choices. The fact of the matter is that draft picked 1-5 are more likely to be high level contributors than draft picks 150-155. I’d rather suck for a few years than enjoy success than being mediocre in perpetuity.
If the team is going to have as a likely ceiling of sneaking into the last playoff spot vs finishing lower in the standings and likely (but not certainly) selecting a more talented player who will improve the chances of being competitive for many years I’d forego the prospect of mediocrity in perpetuity for a more promising future. Delayed gratification and all….mediocrity sucks.
The goal is to compete for a ring. Generally the higher the draft pick the more talented the player. That’s why higher picks get drafted higher than lower picks. I’d rather the Flops pick higher than lower if there’s not much of a chance the team can compete for a ring.
Wouldn’t you?
I’d rather they sell too rather than be buyers in a futile attempt to compete for a ring this year or next. They simply don’t currently have the base of talent to do so. Toro and Gonzalez and some of his mates aren’t the answer. Neither are the dumpster dive pitchers they tend to sign, Crochet being the obvious exception. He looks like the real deal. Hopefully he can stay healthy.
Overall the higher the pick the better the chance that the pick will materialize into a useful player. That’s why there is an order in the draft. The more talented players get picked first, in general.
Whats insane is that it seems some people don’t understand that concept.
We will need a reliable #2 SP, a RH bat , especially if Bregman leaves, a decent backup catcher etc. I don’t keep track of what our competition needs but I don’t think we can fill these holes in one offseason despite our young core.