FredLynn
-
Posts
10,786 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by FredLynn
-
Slightly better than the Rays (57-51 vs 54-53). But over the past several years tanking on the part of the Rays and the Os has brought them much more success than the Flops: 2024: Flops: 81-81; Rays: 80-82; O's: 91-71 2023: Flops: 78-84; Rays99-63; O's: 101-61 2022: Flops: 78-84: Rays: 86-76: O's: 83-79 Because the Rays and O's stunk for years they got high draft picks and built overall winning teams that gave them a chance for a ring-unlike the FLOPS. High draft picks generally are more talented players, as I have written here. Denying that fact is being dishonest. I don't think a single GM would prefer pick 40 over pick 20. So just lose baby!
-
Not at all! I want that money spent during the offseason-not now when the goal is to LOSE as many games as possible. Or at least that SHOULD be the goal. I mentioned Naylor as evidence that the Flops are committed to that lofty goal. It’s the proper strategy.
-
You have to admit that the Rays and the O’s are better teams because of their recent draft pick selections. That’s what I want the Flops to be: improved from the mediocrity they have given their fans for at least four years. I KNOW that if you were the GM you would the highest draft pick possible when the draft begins.
-
The fact that some people here lack is the ability to admit that they are WRONG and that in general the higher the draft pick the better chance the player selected is more talented. Since the FLOPS are going nowhere this year its best to position themselves to get the best draft pick possible by losing as many games as possible for the rest of the year.
-
The logic is simple: the ODDS ARE that the higher the pick the more talented the player is. Otherwise why even have a draft? Its done so that the teams with poorer records have a chance to choose better players. Look at the teams that have consistently had higher draft picks-the O's, the Rays....and while they haven't won rings they have been able to select some high end talent. Those teams have gone from awful to pretty good.
-
Thats not a good enough answer for a real Flops fan. We both know that the ODDS ARE that the higher the draft pick the better the chance of being able to select a player with more talent. Its not a certainty, its an odds thing. Its why there IS a draft order. Overall the higher the pick the better the chance that the player is more talented.
-
You don't know that. Would you rather the FLOPS have the 25th pick or the 40th pick? For example. Be honest!
-
Wrong again! I ALWAYS want what is best for the team, even if it means losing games. Too many people here are satisfied with the mediocrity of the past four years or so. I am not. I don't want them to TRY to make the playoffs-which is possible with some help-because there is no chance to compete for a ring. I am sure you will agree with that. I am not satisfied with last place or .500 finishes, unlike too many posters here. I want to see exciting October baseball, and these FLOPS simply are not going to be able to do that. So why not TANK and fortify the team for a long run in about 2-3 years?
-
Absolutely! Move way up that draft order so they can be a competitive team in a couple of years.
-
The best kind! Not many fans can defer gratification in favor of what’s best for the team!
-
I don’t want to see them in the playoffs this year. I want them to lose as many games as possible. It would provide no satisfaction to make it into the playoffs for a one and done. Just lose baby!
-
Trade Chapman because the team doesn’t deserve to be in the playoffs
-
What is he-two years out of college? He’s definitely a project but athletic players have a better chance of significant improvement than overweight out of shape guys. I think there’s a good chance he’ll work out fine.
-
Look at some of the guys playing 1B now. It’s probably the easiest position to play if you’re not athletically inclined. There’s a reason players get moved to 1B. Putting Campbell there would waste his athleticism.
-
Campbell is way too good an athlete to have him at 1B
-
Right now he needs to get his confidence back
-
Campbell has succeeded at every level he’s played at. He’s also a very good athlete. I could be wrong but I think he’ll figure it out. It was a mistake to bring him up so soon
-
Because he has a lot of potential. I think extending him is going to look very smart in about three years.
-
Campbell wasn’t ready for the ML
-
He’s useless with a bat in his hands
-
They really need to DFA him
-
THEEEEE YANKMEES
-
I think Casas and Campbell will be fine. The others can sell used cars
-
Winning run on 2nd base
-
Winning run on 1st base
