Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. It's just a literary trope. It doesn't bother me. To each their own of course. But again, the historical parallels are kind of freaky.
  2. This is exactly why we have the ugly rumors that this is all about funding other FSG enterprises.
  3. It's not far-fetched, no. It could also quite easily fail. We only have so many credentialed pitchers. Trading Jansen makes it one less, unless they get one back in the trade, which seems rather doubtful.
  4. I commend that attitude, I really do. It's just uncanny that the Sox halfway knowledgeable reporters like Abraham and Speier are flat out convinced we'll get a minor move or two and nothing else. It's not like they've been doomsayers in the past.
  5. a) Of course Snell and Monty have flaws. They passed or missed on all the other worthwhile options too. c) Next year they'll find reasons not to acquire any of those guys either. Starting with too expensive of course. Plus one or more of them will likely sign extensions.
  6. Featuring such classic lines as "I couldn't even cheat these guys to a .500 record."
  7. Subtitled (The Roster is What it Is)
  8. As the article points out, Henry turns 75 this year. It really is a time to contemplate one's legacy.
  9. If they don't at least sign one of Monty or Snell, this is absolutely one of the worst clusterf***s in the history of baseball management. Downright irrational, self-destructive s***.
  10. I know. It really is this bad.
  11. How many c words are off limits here? It's a good article regardless. Some of the parallels with last century are pretty crazy. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
  12. It only makes sense if the payroll budget for tax purposes this year is in fact etched in stone at let's say 200 million. Which would mean any number of lies about the budget have been told us, of course.
  13. Another nicely scathing piece on Henry from OTM: https://www.overthemonster.com/2024/2/8/24063965/john-henrys-legacy-is-on-the-line-red-sox-yankees-dodgers-mookie-betts
  14. Liar Liar Scrooged
  15. What we'll never know is how many other voices he had in his ear on the buy vs. sell decision, including the voice of the big man. It's quite possible of course that he had to make the decision on his own. According to Werner they don't interfere with their CBO, so I'm sure we can take that to the bank.
  16. I see a problem in not weighting anything, lumping in $10 million contracts with $140 million contracts. It's all academic, of course.
  17. So you're saying he sucked on his biggest deals, but you're not counting Story and Yoshida?
  18. Not saying must be fact, but I believe the reports were from credible sources, and if not refuted, why would you doubt them?
  19. So we shouldn't wait on Story and Yoshida, only Bogaerts?
  20. I don't know, I thought Bloom really was trying to do the rebuild but compete thing. He just made some s***** moves, and he got incredibly indecisive at the deadlines. But his offseason moves did make some sense in view of the stated plan.
  21. Not really. The reports of the one year add-on for $30 million to make 4/$90, and the later offer of 6/$162 haven't been disputed AFAIK.
  22. Red Sox media = too lazy to chase the facts.
  23. I love Xander, but that contract he got from San Diego was so inflated it could have floated like the Goodyear blimp...
  24. It wasn't always a slam dunk that he would opt out after 3 years. Anything could have happened.
×
×
  • Create New...