One of the biggest problems with this idea is that it requires outbidding the richest team in baseball for a player who has more value to them than he does to us.
Let's be realistic here. You don't make a colossal investment like that just to 'KO the Yankees'. They're probably not even the biggest threat the next 3 years. And let's not forget that at the end of the day they do have more money than us.
The best thing for us may be to let the Yankees have Cano and his $25 million a year cost.
There's a report that the Yankees offer to Cano is 7 years, 168 million, which sounds right. It's also reported that the offer has a deadline. There are no rumblings at all about other teams being interested enough to try to outbid the Yankees.
My position is this: I fully expect the payroll to end up at least as high as 2013. And I fully expect Ben to do a good job figuring out how best to allocate the remaining dollars.
The 10% annual inflation rate is much, much too high, mark. FanGraphs dollar value per WAR has only gone from about 4.5 million to 5 million over the last 5 years.
Don't forget that Boras was part of the A-Rod opt-out fiasco though. A-Rod had to fire him and go crawling to the Yankees, who rewarded his crawling by bending over.
You might be able to justify 25-30 million a year for 5 years, but that's about it. Cano is 31. He's not much younger than A-Rod was when he signed the 275 million deal that is currently making the Yankees feel like killing him.
Here's one set of pitch framing numbers for 2013. It shows Salty as a little below average. It shows Santana as worse than Salty. Hanigan is one of the better ones.
http://statcorner.com/CatcherReport.php
Defensive metrics for catchers are pretty damn confusing, to me anyway. FanGraphs shows Salty at +7.3 runs defensively, 13th best, and Santana at -9.2 runs. I have no clue what these numbers are worth. Plus nobody can measure game-calling ability.