Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Based on what that Lucchino has actually done though?
  2. We need a new separate thread for people to jibber-jabber about other posters. All you need is a 'cover title' that gets the ball rolling. Like 'Are you an optimistic fan or a pessimistic fan?' Then sit back and watch all hell break loose.
  3. Also, I wish I could have seen video of Lucchino at the meeting with Teixiera and Boras. There were rumors that he really went off. I have this picture of him grabbing for Boras's throat when he realizes Boras has brought them there to tell them it's the Yankees who'll be signing his client.
  4. The quotes from George S. on Lucchino are classic, hilarious. Without looking it up, I'm pretty sure he went on record to warn John Henry about Larry with stuff like this: 'Watch your back, John. This is not a guy you want in your foxhole.' And of course it was Larry with the 'Evil Empire' stuff.
  5. Yep. It's definitely reached the point of Papelyawn now.
  6. I back Lucchino to a certain extent because he's part of the group that brought us 3 titles. He's also the guy who was responsible for Theo being hired in the first place. I think he's probably done some dumb s***, too.
  7. Honest Ben Cherington went on record to say he wanted CC.
  8. Absolutely. And now we have a new storyline on Koji, with $18 million invested in him.
  9. Setting aside Papelbon entirely here, you're correct that the Sox threw away quite a bit of money on Jenks, Hanrahan and Bailey for next to nothing (except Brock Holt). The Jenks signing in particular was a disaster. $12 million minus $1 million they eventually recovered in a settlement I believe.
  10. The Phillies have been conducting themselves like idiots the last few years though. They should have traded Cliff Lee before this too. Now they're hanging onto Hamels.
  11. Billy Beane is still without a title. He does have the honor of being the only GM to have been played by Brad Pitt in a movie, though.
  12. Some of the statistical analysis helped, no doubt. But having one of the highest payrolls and being able to acquire guys like Schilling and Foulke to complement the big talent already in place sure did too.
  13. Yes, 2015, my bad.
  14. No matter how much information you have at your disposal, the performance of some players will be extremely difficult to predict, regardless of injuries. No one could have predicted how bad Crawford would be in 2011, and no one can exactly explain it, either. Some guys are just extremely erratic - like Buchholz and Masterson - and no one is sure exactly why. Some guys 'lose it' and then get it back, like Lester - possibly because of an adjustment in mechanics. I would love to see someone here try to predict the final 2015 numbers for our current rotation. If your numbers are way off because of injury, you get a complete pass, of course.
  15. UN, you said 'over a larger sample, advanced statistics can pretty accurately predict what a player will do.' Then you said 'in the end, there's just no foolproof way to accurately predict what a player(s) is (are) going to do in the future.' ???
  16. It's a good question. With some exceptions, the future performance of baseball players remains very difficult to predict. Carl Crawford's stats going into 2011 didn't justify $142 million, but they sure made him look like a premier all-around player.
  17. WAR is more useful for me now, I guess, because I don't watch nearly as many games as I used to.
  18. Also, the Lackey signing doesn't look quite so bad anymore.
  19. To me Jeter is actually another good example of the usefulness of WAR. He took a beating in recent years for his defense but his WAR supports his total value because his offense was so much higher than an average SS's, and he was so durable etc.
  20. Sometimes even one-sided games turn on one piece of luck. The one play might be a grand slam-4 runs at once. Or a bunch of runs might come in after the one play. It's just the way baseball is. It's a different game.
  21. A player like Pedey is one reason I like looking at WAR to see what a player really contributed in total.
  22. Nah, we still woulda won that series, but in 7 games. Plenty of teams have come from 2-0 down. Seriously, you could also say we were very lucky in 2004 and 2007 to come from 3-0 and 3-1 ALCS deficits. So you could say we're incredibly lucky to have 3 titles. If that's how you to choose to look at it. Or you could say we should have won in 1975, 1978, 1986, 2003 and 2008.
  23. One thing I would also point out is that several World Series teams over the past decade or so have had closers who had great seasons or great postseasons virtually out of nowhere.
  24. He signed the extension in July/13. He finished 7th in 2013 MVP voting. How is that being paid on reputation? He's being paid on past performance, yes, but which players aren't?
  25. Talk of trading Pedroia doesn't seem to be paying much attention to his huge defensive value, especially considering that we now have a bunch of groundball pitchers.
×
×
  • Create New...