Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    54,662

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    Stuff like that is not really unusual, especially if you don't live in Boston.
  2. Bellhorn04
    FWIW, one of SI's Jay Jaffe's 'bold predictions for second half' is: 'Red Sox will shore up rotation with Pomeranz and win the AL East going away'.
  3. Bellhorn04
    I believe the player has to be on the 40-man roster to count toward tax. This was talked about a lot when Allen Craig was taken off the 40-man roster. http://www.overthemonster.com/2016/1/13/10759208/red-sox-allen-craig-offseason-trade-rumors
  4. Bellhorn04
    You pinpointed exactly what they were looking for in Peavy - a solid #3. And that's exactly what he was in 2013.
  5. Bellhorn04
    Looks like he was only talking about the luxury tax cap though.
  6. Bellhorn04
    He's a kid and the Sox already won a ring for him.
  7. Bellhorn04
    Peavy was 1.3 years of control though, so that commands a bit more. Also, Iggy has been proven to be no more than a mediocre player (an accumulated bWAR of 2.9 with Detroit.)
  8. Bellhorn04
    He can't focus long enough to look for where it should go. He needs Ritalin.
  9. Bellhorn04
    Hill shouldn't cost a big haul in prospects though.
  10. Bellhorn04
    Well, they should be doing it then.
  11. Bellhorn04
    I don't think they should be bundled together, it makes our debates even messier than they already are - if that's possible.
  12. Bellhorn04
    The Donaldson trade was one of the all-time robberies.
  13. Bellhorn04
    I've told you 10 million times not to exaggerate like that.
  14. Bellhorn04
    I think Rich Hill might be a good get. The guy has actually pitched fantastically well since last September. Beane will be trading him somewhere, that's for sure.
  15. Bellhorn04
    At this point Rich Hill is looking pretty good, with fingers crossed for health of course.
  16. Bellhorn04
    The Jays made a pretty good run at it last year, taking the champs to 6 games and creating a lot of excitement for the fans. Don't count them out this year just yet either.
  17. Bellhorn04
    OK I'll bite. Other than Carl Crawford, Epstein's record in negotiations was fine.
  18. Bellhorn04
    No love for Eddie Stanky? http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/stanked01.shtml
  19. Bellhorn04
    It's team dependent because a pitcher with a good defense behind him will have more runs saved than a pitcher with a bad defense. For example JBJ will run down more balls than an inferior CFer. This has nothing to do with errors. It has to do with fielding range. As for pitcher errors, ERA is meant to measure the pitcher's pitching, not his fielding. As for the luck part, well, you're probably disgusted enough already.
  20. Bellhorn04
    And Buch will squash your hopes every time. He did it to me this year for the last time.
  21. Bellhorn04
    I admit the quotes from Merloni were accurate...that's it. And the quotes from Merloni were harmless. Some doc showed up some day between the years 1998 and 2001 and told the Sox players how not to get caught using steroids, and the players all looked at each other in disbelief. Quite the smoking gun.
  22. Bellhorn04
    Yeah but they usually have something to do with the content that follows.
  23. Bellhorn04
    All of which averages out to a guy who gives you slightly above average quality and well below average quantity.
  24. Bellhorn04
    Now you're trying to start a whole other dead horse debate. Well done.
  25. Bellhorn04
    I don't, but I'm extremely heartened by his advanced metrics. They really do make the world a better place.
×
×
  • Create New...