Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Or he's....you know.....sick.
  2. User Name
    Gomes don't give a f***. First one in the warzone. And if Lackey gives up a run because of his bravado act i'm a smack him in his horseface.
  3. User Name
    I want to see this settle with a DP-Ortiz vs Scott-Rodriguez tag team match.
  4. User Name
    Turns out the Cards were right to "disrespect" Pujols. They could put virtually everyone on their team at 1B right now and he'd outproduce Pujols
  5. User Name
    No. He just sucks.
  6. User Name
    What a lame-ass excuse. What was the reason for his suck before they got Tebow then?
  7. User Name
    Why do you bother? He doesn't know what he's talking about.
  8. User Name
    Ozzie Guillen didn't say it outright, but he thinks Bobby V. is a f***ing idiot. Who doesn't?
  9. User Name
    Pedroia making it look easy
  10. User Name
    Guillen talking about the s***** conditions of the Trop.
  11. User Name
    0-2 count, pitch right down the middle. GTFO Lackey.
  12. User Name
    Btw Ozzie Guillen on the spanish ESPN broadcast. Lolwut?
  13. User Name
    Lackey, you are messing with my mojo
  14. User Name
    Also, how is Iglesias "coming back down to earth"? He's hitting .421 with a .491 OBP his last 15 games, and .476 with a .577 OBP his last seven games. That is the opposite of "coming down to earth", that is "setting the league on fire"
  15. User Name
    How is it a slap in the face? They just DFA'd another player to keep him up and are looking for any possible way to give him playing time.
  16. User Name
    Carp should see more time against tough righties at 1B spelling Napoli. You also never know when Victorino will crash against a wall or Jacoby will have some sort of injury problem as well. He'll play.
  17. User Name
    You don't say? It's not like everyone, including the post right above yours, has presented this idea.
  18. User Name
    So we can't present our ideas on what could/should happen to a Red Sox player on a Red Sox website?
  19. User Name
    John "Horseface" Lackey http://mlb.mlb.com/images/players/525x330/alt/407793.jpg 3-5, 2.79 ERA Vs Alex "I'm really not this good" Cobb http://mlb.mlb.com/images/players/525x330/502171.jpg 6-2, 2.39 ERA Predictions: Papi goes yard, Pedey gets on base three times, Lackey goes six with six K's. WIN!
  20. User Name
    If he keeps regressing, we'll all be left wondering if a significant pitching prospect or two could've been obtained by trading Lester.
  21. User Name
    Not a fan of 100 million contracts for pitchers. If they can't get him for 5/85 or less, trade him in the offseason.
  22. User Name
    One thing the Sox should explore is playing Carp at 1B and giving Napoli some more days off. Nava's stats are also certain to improve at least a bit if he's not playing against lefties for ASG consideration purposes.
  23. User Name
    Yup. I'd take on his remaining salary and ship away two middling prospects.
  24. User Name
    Also, you shouldn't be lecturing me because you no longer follow this team since they didn't score twelve on Blanton in the first inning
  25. User Name
    My problem is taking on big salaries for players who are: A) Past their prime, B ) Have some sort of checkered injury history, C ) Derive part of their value from playing in a position they could not stay on. If you wanted to trade half the farm for a guy like Hernandez, Kershaw, Machado (not that it will ever happen), Darvish, Alex Gordon, etc. i'd be all for it. But Lee and Mauer both have a prohibitive salary and question marks surrounding them that make them a risk that this franchise should not be willing to take.
×
×
  • Create New...