Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Hair envy. And penis envy. And weather envy.
  2. User Name
    Farrell won't make it through Memorial Day. Mark my words.
  3. User Name
    I don't wear hats. I still have a full head of hair.
  4. User Name
    The gates represent a very significant percentage of team revenues.
  5. User Name
    What's he going to say about an ST start? "Man, this guy f***ing sucks, DFA his ass!!!!". If he does it during the season, have at him, but what's the point about complaining about peachy reports during ST?
  6. User Name
    Ugueth Urbina....remember him?
  7. User Name
    Voice of reason.
  8. User Name
    Lovullo plz
  9. User Name
    Porcello pitched 204.2 IP in 2014, but I digress.
  10. User Name
    If they offered Devers, the Padres would take Pablo's contract and maybe some of Shields'. Come back to reality plz.
  11. User Name
    You keep thinking it's because he's fat, but it's because he sucks. I'd trade him for a fatter guy (Fielder) in a heartbeat. He can rake and can actually play a defensive position at a replacement level.
  12. User Name
    ...unless the Sox eat both contracts and give them a juicy prospect in return. Make that offer, and they won't hang up the phone.
  13. User Name
    I'll dirnk (and enjoy) a Dr. Pepper to this post. Cheers!
  14. User Name
    So f***ing what? If I lived there and I had the money, I'd go. I don't, so I watch on TV, and I buy merchandise when I can. Am I less of a fan because I live thousands of miles away?
  15. User Name
    But he's not a number 2. He'd be great for the middle of the rotation.
  16. User Name
    Want me to be honest? I'd rather they spent it on upgrading anything instead of pocketing it.
  17. User Name
    Hanley's contract was not the reason they didn't go for more SP's. This is the Boston Red Sox, not exactly a team with the ability to call "poverty". They felt good enough about their SP depth that they actually traded Miley away for Smith.
  18. User Name
    If Hanley hits, will he be an unnecessary contract? Even though Ortiz never made 22 million, if Hanley plays well enough to be considered for a full time 1B position or a rotation with Travis, it's not uneccessary money. If he hits like he's capable of, he will earn his money. Again, production will dictate playing time. That is a Dombrowski trademark.
  19. User Name
    No, because Hanley will be DH'ing. If Travis can play, he will play. If the veterans are outplaying him, he will get more seasoning. That is how DD operates, simple as that.
  20. User Name
    I just want them to put a good product on the field. Their marketing ploys couldn't mean less to me.
  21. User Name
    I'd agree, but he basically already lost his job to Shaw. But he certainly needs to go be fat somewhere else, or lose the weight and start catching and hitting the ball again.
  22. User Name
    Those three championships sure make me feel like a dope!
  23. User Name
    Bale some hay? Bale some Bale, like Christian Bale?
  24. User Name
    Of course, it's not like we have discussed this ad nauseum in at least five (maybe six?) other threads.
  25. User Name

    The Cubs

    User Name replied to iortiz's topic in Other Baseball

    I count seven. Lackey, Lester, Ross, Machi, Victorino, Kalish, Federowicz.
×
×
  • Create New...