I have seen this posted here and elsewhere before and it simply makes no sense. You cannot have average starting pitching and make it up in offense. That has worked on occasion especially through the Steroid era but even if it gains you success in the regular season it almost insures failure in the post season.
In addition, aiming for average starting pitching will almost insure below average starting pitching and with that you are not only insuring failure in the post season if you get there but you put in great jeopardy any chance that you will get there.
What are these proponents of offense suggesting? Are they suggesting that the Sox would have to score on an all time record setting basis in order to succeed using such a formula? I don't think they really mean to imply that but in fact that is what you are implying when you suggest that the second best offense in baseball tied to the 27th best starting pitching in baseball needs more offense to win.
I will acknowledge that timely hitting as opposed to hitting in general has been a problem for this team. However when your starting pitching which is without any question the most important facet of baseball is 27th out of 30, you are going nowhere.
If you have such feebly starting pitching and such porous defense, you are going nowhere. Never mind the error totals, this team gives up extra outs like they were Easter candy.