Now your grabbing at straws but I understand. I just don't see it.
I don't see it as smart for the FO nor in fact for us to bite on some monster Ells contract if we think the best team they can build will be a team built by using their assets as effectively as they can as it relates to the potential performance of the team on the field.
The whole point of having a farm system is to build as much as you can off that farm system, letting go of guys that appear fragile in some sense or that see their promise resolve itself in disappointment or that simply do not provide you with enough value relative to other choices. Ells may not fall into the former categories but if he does go to FA under terms favorable to him he will certainly fall into the latter relative to the Sox. Besides, if the whole issue of trying to build super-teams has not been put to rest by now, I just no longer know what it will take.
A "team" is best described as component parts that are as effectively complimentary as possible. Professional teams must deal with the additional component of doing things that make good business sense as well.
As for moving Ells to LF, at the point of his reaching FA, I very strongly suspect that Boras and Ells will insist that the Sox will keep him in CF. The Sox would be even dumber to overpay Ells to move him to LF.
While the Dodgers are going though their period of spending money foolishly just because they have it and are trying to draw fans back from having endured one of the worst ownership groups in history, I just do not think it wise for a professional sports organization to supplant good judgement and planning with money.