Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

iortiz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by iortiz

  1. Do you aware that pitching in the last inning is something else than pitching in the 7th or 8th and mostly in close games and/or pressure situations? Do you? If not, do not keep reading, would be worthless the discussion. My point all along is that Papelbon is not an experiment. He's a stud in that role. Look at his career numbers. IMO He is in that famous Mo's highway . He's been consistent and durable for 9 yrs man, 9! And still young and with a lot experience under his belt ... And not to mention and mostly already proved in your own environment. Notice that I'm not saying that Tazawa couldn't do the job, but to me would be another experiment. He is an unproven closer in the end. I'm not sure about you, but I'm done with experiments. Look what happened with Bard, Aceves, Etc. and in the meantime those experiments and bad decisions had cost us a lot of money-- could have used on Pap's contract--, prospects and most important, wins. Again that is my opinion.
  2. Yes, and that is my opinion. I already rest my case.
  3. Playing the victim? Nahhhh man. Not at all. You say that to all that dare to disagree with you. That is a fact too.
  4. I have no problem with people disagreeing with me in this topic or any other. Problem is that some posters want to convince others the way they view the game or any other topic saying that this has "no sense" or what is the other sentence? "You have reading comprehension problems", or even with personal attacks, when somebody thinks different. That has been the problem all along.
  5. Hadn't noticed but glad to see that I have some fans even though they do not agree with me
  6. My bad, I should say our backed of our rotation and depth with Aceves. Hopefully Webster had learned something about his last start and give us a possibility to at least keep us in the game.
  7. bringing nothing to the table? C'mon man we have discussed this over and over and over so many times, look at threads, this isn't new at all. We already rest the case sooooooo many times. Sure, You can agree or disagree on this but saying that we haven't brought nothing to the table is not fair.
  8. Not sure if we should explore another SP as well. Seems like our depth has worked out just fine lately with Aceves and Doub. Hopefully they keep going that way. On the other hand I have little concern about Buch's health and Lester's inconsistency.
  9. Not sure why you try/want to convince me. Is that so important to u? Really?
  10. Not sure what's your point man, but I think you know my position on this, don't you?
  11. Really? C'mon man! That was buried. Done. We were talking about Bailey and you know it.
  12. If that were the price I would make the deal in a heartbeat.
  13. It wasn't the discussion at all MVP, and you know it. Stop the ******** storm. On the other hand if there were a possibility I I would explore which prospects we are talking about. Ain't gonna happen, though.
  14. Oh boy, not sure how you made the math but its glad to see I have a 25% loyal fan base on my side
  15. Knew it. You blame me again about the Pap thing and wasn't me who brought him to the discussion, was your boy MVP. Check it up. And that is absolutely untrue. He has worth every penny thus far, look at the numbers. And most likely will worth for the rest of his contract.
  16. You missed bold this and compare. Look how much you have spent in closers since Pap walked and see the results --- failure and overpays. On the other hand see the results of Pap in Philly thus far --success; every penny spent on him has worth thus far. To you, nothing makes sense unless you agree on. Nothing new.
  17. Well, seems that we are winning despite Bailey.
  18. you are a very funny guy
  19. Cmon man! That was kind of sarcastic, but still some people here think that way, though. Don't believe me? Look at your recent posts about Pap in the other threads.
  20. Ok, Conceded. Seriously, if we had a good closer, not a great one (like Pap), just a good one, and if this team keeps playing like this, we would be almost unbeatable.
  21. That's the problem. He can't stay healthy. Seems like He has a DL membership free pass. And naaaah, Pap's contract wouldn't have hurt this organization at all, just the opposite. Look how much you have spent in closers since Pap walked and see the results --- failure and overpays. On the other hand see the results of Pap in Philly thus far --success; every penny spent on him has worth thus far.
  22. Pap just blew a game in Philly yesterday and made me lose money in a parlay bet and Pal lost some points in his fantasy team. Wonder if Philly's FO/fans or fantasy gamers are concern about him. The answer is most likely no, since he has been consistent and reliable not only this season but for so many years. At least I wouldn't drop him in my fantasy team, but just in case, hey Pal, if you want to trade Pap let me know BTW Notice that wasn't me who brought Papelbon to the discussion
  23. Yup, a 2.32 ERA player with 60+ IP and 35+ SV through 9 years is the consistency I'm looking for, but unfoutunatly ain't gonna happen. Not sure why Papelbon and Bailey are in the same discussion, is not even fair. BTW do you want another 3 pages of discussion of why Papelbon was/is so good? Or you are being a dick... again.
  24. Media, experts, FO, fans, and several posters here (look at the pool) have concerns about him. If he is reliable why all these concerns and questions marks surround him... Why? Maybe because he is not reliable at this point? Do not take me wrong, I want him to bounce back but at this point sounds more like a good wish than a real possibility. We'll see.
  25. Lol C'mon men, the fried chicken and beer thing was a sarcastic/joke comment in order to "complement" the possible causes of his failure since he arrived to Boston. We all know that he wasn't in 11, again, it was sarcastic. Bottom Line: In order to be reliable you need consistency and durability, things that Bailey hasn't shown for whatever reason, since he arrived to Boston. That is the fact gentlemen.
×
×
  • Create New...