true.
You were winning the entire week, somehow I could tied it.
You are right, I have no pitching at all, on the other hand , you have a pretty good staff in that department, If you are interested in a trade, let me know.
Wow! I know that Toronto is in bad shape right now but did not know they were this bad. They are playing like a bush team. The funny thing is that we are not making them pay as it should be thus far. Unacceptable if we L today.
You are a mass of contradictions. You said that you don't need comparisons. SFF put a list and now you approve it. Of course you need to take references in order to make a case. Problem in his case, nobody match him today no named Mo. I already rest my case. You refuse to see the point and the facts. You just can't accept that he could have a great career. You say that he will injure some how. There's no single clue under his belt in order to think that. You said that he just started a decline. That's a dead wrong. Numbers do not lie. Check them out.
Thing is, he has been terrific. Period. He is not the another "reliever". He's out of that bulk.
Numbers are there. He has been durable. He is still young. He'll be fine or better than when he was here.
1. well, just saying... just in case.
2. When I said that other no named Papelbon would have been an experiment is because Pap was already proved here... the others?, well, no, because haven't had that role here...hence would have been experiments/gambles/bets/risks or whatever you want to call it . No rocket science here. Not sure where's the problem.
1. Means that it could help u if your head is about to explode.
2. Nothing is for sure in this life but given the facts he would have been the best bet.
Problem is that our great FO love to put tons of money in wounded old fat horses and invent the cold water with their experiments instead of keeping the solid durable proved players.
This is Pap case.