Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

iortiz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by iortiz

  1. LOL I didn't bash Barnes. All his career stats, including ERA, are way far from his 2021 performance until August. That was all my point all along. He was a mediocre pitcher. This year (before August) he had been Koji 2.0.
  2. Barnes was an experiment at closing this year. He never was full-time closer. They gave him the job because we had no other option or at least a better option to start off. Probably Ottavino was going to be the next to be evaluated, IDK. He started very good and kept the job. He was so good that he was even extended. Said that Ottavino and Whitlock are the next best viable options at this point to continue the experiment. Honestly I don't know what to expect from Barnes moving forward, his good performance this year is a very short sample vs what his career numbers suggest.
  3. Out there are fairly only a few number of closers who have been closing consistently this year (and years), and will likely keep their role. Only a few. No, not all good RPs have the profile to close well and consistently in a year/years. Why? some just can't handle the pressure in the ninth. It's as simple as that.
  4. SV% is actually the stat you have to look at when you rate a closer. Some closers close games cleanly, some not that much but if both have a 90 SV% or something close I don't care how they close. How many blown saves does he have in July and August vs April, May and June? Also ERA is a terrible stat for relievers and specially in short samples but still his ERA went form 11(June) to 4 (July and August). You are cherry picking. Said that ERA is a solid stat in career samples but not my fav lol. I don't have a fav actually, it depends on the case.
  5. Can any good RP close games consistently in large period of times?
  6. It's a skill. His skill (handling pressure) these days is not good. It happens with any kind of skill. He needs to rest and clear his head. As ill said this is related with his mind. I agree.
  7. While the BP has been horrible all-in-all lately, Barnes needs a rest to clear his head. It worked for Chapman. Right now he is the worst piece of the pen for high leverage situations. I think Whitlock could be a good option.
  8. People will tell you that handle pressure is not a skill lol
  9. Whata disaster.
  10. Geez we are about to give up this game again lol
  11. Should have been an easy game and Perez and D s*** the bed. Time to tax the pen again.
  12. And just like that It’s a 3-run game.
  13. Another error to the books folks. Are we the worst D in majors? If not, I guess we are close.
  14. Renfroe smoked that one.
  15. I f***ing hate all these interviews. Game is unwatchable.
  16. JDM is not a top of the order material in this Lup. It’s a shame.
  17. I want to see playing in a regular basis these players regardless the position and lineup. Devers Xander Arroyo Shwarber JD Verdugo Renfroe Kevin Kike
  18. Again in Kershaw's case the sample is fair and all-in-all he's been mediocre in POs. He's been in a lot of PO games. To me pressure is the main factor, yes. My common sense says he just blocks in those environments.
  19. Thing is, as I said, POs are the only instances where pressure is at its highest while facing the cream of the cream. If the sample is fair like Kershaw’s there’s no other reason.
  20. It’s common sense moon. Pressure is the reason. No rocket science. Pressure is a mental thing. It is an intangible which tax you in key moments if you can’t handle it. Keshaw simply can’t handle the pressure irradiated in POs, he just can’t. His mind blocks hence his performance is mediocre— call it “plain old reason” answer if you want lol
  21. Yeah. Remember 2018 against us? If he had been something close to what he was in regular season, we wouldn’t have won that WS. PO is a different season or instance. The situation is another animal. You face the cream of the cream and with a lot of pressure. Only a few prevail regardless how great you are. Kershaw certainly is not that group.
  22. Assuming numbers keep kind of the same, I think Kershaw will pass to the history of the game as one of the greatest who simply couldn’t handle pressure when it mattered the most —in POs.
  23. Yup. This random thing does not make sense to me either. His numbers in POs are mediocre. It’s a fact and the sample is pretty fair to me. I would bet that he is one of the pitchers with more IPs in POs in the game. So if his sample is not fair, no one’s is, and POs numbers are meaningless by definition —which they are not. OTOH He is one of the best in the game in regular season, no doubt. Geez if Kershaw had been something close to the pitcher he was in regular season, Los Dodgers would have had at very least another ring.
×
×
  • Create New...