Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    84,353

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    235

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. mvp 78
    Maybe because Price's money could be better spent elsewhere?
  2. mvp 78
    That's why I'm here.
  3. mvp 78
    Schilling threw everything away the second he hung his cleats up. Money? Gone. Goodwill? Gone. The more I hear from Schilling, the more I believe in the ketchup/marker theory.
  4. mvp 78
    Do they need to package the manager in a crate on the back of the truck?
  5. mvp 78
    Attn notin: https://www.overthemonster.com/2020/1/27/21082944/boston-red-sox-mookie-betts-trade-jackie-bradley-jr-yasiel-puig
  6. mvp 78
    Which position will he play?
  7. mvp 78
    I'm glad that Bloom is now weighing multiple offers at the very least. Hard to get the best return possible if you are only talking to one trade partner.
  8. mvp 78
    And both will be cheaper than Bradley. Pillar and Bradley are both close enough in skill set that I would have non tendered JBJ and signed Pillar.
  9. mvp 78
    I was just trying to name a guy that could start for us, but wouldn't be in the Dodgers Opening Day rotation this year. Dodgers really used him like a swing man last year. Maybe they'd rather Price who can eat innings?
  10. mvp 78
    Nope.
  11. mvp 78
    It's far more likely Bloom goes with option 2 rather than get stuck with long term dead money. I'm here for it.
  12. mvp 78
    Price (1/2 contract) for Stripling and a prospect?
  13. mvp 78
    Seems like the Pads were just interested in jettisoning Myers' salary?
  14. mvp 78
    Why would the Dodgers want Price?
  15. mvp 78
    So because the Dodgers took on CC's bad contract in 2012, they are more likely to do that 8 years later? I can't say I agree with that reasoning.
  16. mvp 78
    We know how all the posters on here love that virtue!
  17. mvp 78
    Why tender him was always my question. There were a few cheaper comparable options in FA.
  18. mvp 78
    That's pending on those high quality players being available in FA at positions of need.
  19. mvp 78
    They should trade La Jolla for Newton.
  20. mvp 78
    Kabloom
  21. mvp 78
    100%
  22. mvp 78
    Sounds good for me. Only fair.
  23. mvp 78
    Manager by ipad.
  24. mvp 78
    Even you Jacko couldn’t have dreamed of a nightmare scenario like this.
  25. mvp 78
    He’s following orders.
×
×
  • Create New...