Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Dipre

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Dipre

  1. You're an idiot. When you learn how to read, maybe people will start taking you seriously. Because of your lack of a functioning brain, i'll spoon-feed it to you: I'm not saying Ortiz didn't do steroids. I'm saying he probably started doing steroids during the end of his tenure in Minnesota and continued during his time with the Red Sox. I'll use smaller words if you can't understand the ones i'm using.
  2. In 2003? Seriously? In 2003? Seriously?
  3. I've seen a lot of idiots during my time here. Tyler Durden is clearly their pit-boss.
  4. I wasn't. I was too busy thinking about other options than Marco Scutaro.
  5. That's about the extent of my point. How Gom and Jacko managed to turn that into a full-blown "Pa-PED" discussion is beyond my realm of comprehension. We all know Ortiz used, but even if he started using in 2003, if he had supplied the Sox with the .839 OPS he gave the Twins in '02 at DH, he would've still been an absolute success and the foremost example of a low-risk/high-reward signing.
  6. Then i'll go ahead and ask: Do you think David Ortiz and Russ Branyan were low-risk/high-reward propositions?
  7. How is that pertinent to the discussion? Of course it's a blatant attempt to draw ire from Sox fans.
  8. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
  9. That was never the point of the discussion. What was being discussed was the existence of a "Low risk/high reward" investment. I mentioned David Ortiz, but the NYY contingent immediately cried "PED" like it was pertinent to the discussion.
  10. It's hilarious how the point just flew over his head.
  11. *Sigh* If you can't prove he started when he came to the Sox or before, then you can't attack the low risk/high reward theory which is what was actually being discussed. You got so tangled up in your own stupidity you forgot what the actual point was. It's ok Gom, it's what we've come to expect from you.
  12. Jason Bay. Victor Martinez.
  13. Billy Wagner is 39-year-old pitcher who was coming from elbow surgery and also didn't want to set up for Papelbon. Are you really this dumb?
  14. Of course you can't.
  15. Great defense at SS is good though. You've been all over him since the deadline. So? Listen, if they sign a couple more type A's. I'll gladly eat crow. But i sincerely doubt they sign more than one.
  16. Gom's idiocy, as usual, is easily shown throughout his post. The point is, he probably did not start using steroids in 2003. You don't have any way to prove he did, so as usual, you're talking out of your ass. Kudos to logic. Certainly has been able to avoid you for quite some time.
  17. No i didn't. Maybe you didn't read the entire post? If you didn't like the question and didn't want to come up with a thought-out response, why come back with a one-liner?
  18. That was said by ORS, not me. *sigh* Give me hard evidence of the "Different approach" taken on David Ortiz. Or is this an underhanded attempt at bashing him?
  19. Something between suck and average. lol lol Pining for Scutaro. lol Forfeiting a draft pick. lol lol
  20. I don't think i have ever seen a thread with more than ten pages on this site where someone hasn't bashed JD Drew. Christ, what does the guy have to do for people to STFU about him?
  21. He had 100 less AB's in 2001 than 2000. Yet he nearly doubled his homerun output and had only 11 less XBH. If you don't consider that a power spike i don't know what to tell you.
×
×
  • Create New...