Au contraire, you wouldn't have referenced it if it wasn't important to you. Again, i was merely responding to Crunchy. W-L% should be inconsequential to a pitcher's HOF case, but the fact that you so fervently defend the point means you care for it, or you wouldn't have defended Crunchy's stance. That or you didn't read what he said in the first place, meaning you were just arguing for the sake of arguing, which would be worse IMO.