Ok, when i posted first on the subject--all i was saying was that i had cold pizza on one day and they were talking about the book, and that Selig could throw bonds and sheff out of baseball if it was "in the best interest of the game". Then after another comment i posted:
(he was actually referring to sheff there) Now i didn't read either canseco's book or "game of shadows". I was merely commenting on what i heard on the show that morning, and what their thoughts were. I didn't know if Giambi was using roids in oakland, i suspected he was, but on the show they said he wasn't and that he didn't start until he got hooked up with Greg anderson. Then you post this:
I don't believe (or take as proof) what is in his book--you didn't say that he admitted it in the grand jury--if he did i was unaware of it at the time of the post. I responded saying that canseco's book is not proof, and that everything i mentioned was from the book "game of shadow" which was using the court documents--just sticking to what could be proved in a court of law! and when i state that you say:
Completely ignoring what i had just said--that i was just stating what i knew to be true from verified sources! After this of course you went into your "i wanted your opinion, he already admitted it under grand jury (which you haven't mentioned until now), your doing this cause you hate the yankees" posts. If you look back i originally started this using bonds and sheff--somehow Giambi gets brought up, you take it and run with it, and we end up here.
From the beggining my post was just stating on what i had heard and that "according to cold pizza" selig could kick bonds and sheff out "in the best interest in baseball". I understand your need to point out that giambi was using before he came to NY, and that's fine. Sorry if i offended you with the "yankers" comments. My best friend is a NY fan, and we always banter back and forth, and i started doing that a long time ago. Sorry, i didn't realize that something like that would get under your skin so bad!