Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. Who was it that guaranteed us that this idiocy would not happen in the playoffs?
  2. In both Wild Card games all the top starters s*** all over themselves. Maybe the pattern is continuing into the ALDS.
  3. We need to hit. In particular, Pedroia and Nunez need to not be rusty.
  4. Your Prize money has been sent via PayPal. Congratulation!!
  5. Back to Back Division Titles and there is so much hand-wringing. This is a pretty great thing that none of us have ever seen before. Anyone who is unhappy about this or concerned about the future obviously cannot enjoy good fortune or live in and enjoy the moment. Different strokes, but I prefer to stay away from compulsive negativity.
  6. Until now, I haven't made a claim about a player being clutch. I have just said that clutch is an attribute -- one that would exhibit itself in different ways. What kind of measure would satisfy you? And how would you arrive at it? You are the one saying that it doesn't exist. Tell us what kind of measure or statistics would convince you.
  7. With Pablo, they will get a Twinkie in a bottle.
  8. If the Red Sox did not think that it would have benefited them if he had accepted an assignment to AAA, they would have just released him
  9. And you set the rules? Your argument and logic is fatuous BS. Clutch is not a label like a clothing size. And no one is making a list of clutch players or a list of chokers. Where would the cutoff be? Your insistence on a definitive measure is really in the realm of dopey. Your insistence that you are right is downright obnoxious.
  10. I said you win. Can't you take yes for an answer. But it is all just opinion. On that, you are DFW.
  11. These announcers are so prone to overstatement.
  12. LOL! Good game Twins. Couldn't even hold the lead for 1 inning.
  13. As usual, the Twins don't administer the kill shot, and it will only be a matter of time for them to crumble. SOS.
  14. I find it amusing when people declare victory in an opinion based discussion. Okay, you win.
  15. Excellent points and let's add that statistics that appear to be random are the product of efforts that are anything but random.
  16. Again, you are making yourself the arbiter of what defines the attribute. I disagree and think you are wrong.
  17. It is all opinion. Obviously, good performance stats bolster a case.
  18. Sample size large or small does nothing to prove or disprove clutch. In fact, the larger the sample size, the more normal those pressure situations become. Players can acclimate and adjust to those situation the more often they encounter them. Jeter had so many post season ABs that I am sure the adrenaline rush wore off many years before he hung up his spikes. I think a player who might have been a choker can become a clutch player from experience those situation over and over. Also, some guys are clutch from the start and don't need the additional reps.
  19. That is your issue of insisting on tying it to performance statistics. All of the payers have a lot of talent, and yes it is the emotional attribute that does separate them in those high pressure situations. Contrary to the beliefs of some, these amazing athletes who have reached the height of their profession can and do get nervous. Some can handle it better than others. Whether someone is clutch will always be a topic for debate, but the players know who has a steel spine and who wilts.
  20. I am not defining it, nor am I saying that any particular player is clutch. I am just saying that it is an attribute. You can continue to try to prove or disprove it statistically and you can have fun eating soup with a fork.
  21. IMO, you are wrong. You don't get to set the parameters of how to prove whether someone possesses an attribute.
  22. Did you make par?
×
×
  • Create New...