Yeah, the guy was a stud with 5 tools. He played on cellar-dwelling horrible teams his first 5 or 6 years. Even afterward, he rarely played on a .500 team until he played for the Braves after age 40. His early career was during pre-steriod days, so his extra-base power for a middle infielded was considered to be well-above average. In addition, from 1986-1991 he finished in the top 10 in AL Bat Avg four times and won the Batting title in 1991. From '84 to '91, he finished in the top ten in hits 5 times, each year with more than 180 hits. From '87-'91, he finished in the top 10 in OBP 4 of those 5 years. He stole more than 30 bases 4 times and he won the AL Silver Slugger award for second basemen 4 straight years from 1988 to 1991. So, yeah he was a stud, but on a very, very bad team. We should only hope Youklis had his talent. OBP or OPS are not necessarily the best indicators of performance for past players. It is also unfair to apply benchmarks such as .400 OPB to eras that were not offensively dominated as is today's game. Players must be judged in the context of their time. Finally, there is no better judge of a guys performance than the people who saw him play. I saw him come up as a rookie. If you don't believe me, ask others who saw him play, or at least dig deeper than a few isolated stats. The fact that he is 47 and still holding his own should indicate that the guy had been very talented when he was young.