The funny thing about a weak bench is that it is the big situation that exposes it, not the Sunday afternoon against KC. It is not moot point. I remember the Sox having a fat waste named Bob Bailey batting against Goose Gossage in the one game playoff in 1978, so don't tell me that it can't happen.
The second part of this sentence is accurate insofar as I don't get emotionally excited about a player until I see him playing for the Red Sox. I've repeatedly told you that you should not conclude from that that I don't follow our prospects, but you keep making the same erroneous conclusion. You should know by now that I go to Spring Training every year (6 years in a row). Before I go, I read whatever i can about our prospects so I know who I am watching. I like to go during the first two weeks so I see most of the prospects before they get sent down. Nevertheless, I expect that you will continue with the same misrepresentations the next time we are discussing a prospect.
A lot of players break down as they get into their 30's, but apparently you have no problem of making accusations about cheating without evidence. I guess you are basing that on what you have observed and call that an educated guess, but when I offer an opinion about a player's abilities based on my observations him play you crucify me. Do I really need a stat to prove that Hinske is not a good OFer nor is Teahen?
We really don't know if Bates will ever hold down a major league position for a full season, but you have him penciled in for 20-30 HRs. Maybe you are a little ahead of yourself?