If anything, popularity meant more in Ruth's day than today. You can't say that there is no comparison because the game is different today. Yes it is different today. More tickets are sold than ever before, but the impact of individual players on gate receipts is much harder to define, because same-day walk up ticket sales are not as significant today. Back in Ruth's day when a popular pitcher pitched there would probably be 10,000 -15,000 additional fans in the stands. It was very easy to measure. Player popularity was maybe more important in those days, because players stayed with the same organization due to the reserve clause. Because they had less invested in those players, teams were more willing to let a popular guy sit on the bench for a year or so past his prime before they cut him. Today, popular players are allowed to walk away all the time. Look at Pedro for instance. He was every bit as popular as Ortiz, and they let him walk rather than invest anymore money in him. Ortiz probably will also be allowed to walk after this season whether or not he produces. What is the difference to the fan if a popular player leaves by trade, release or free agency? Is one way more upsetting than the others, resulting in retribution against the organization?