Yes, whether he has done a good job vs bad job hinges on how things turn out the next few weeks. You get judged on results. That's what you are not understanding. Based on what you are saying, a team that finshes 12 games out of first every year could argue that you can't judge them based on those 12 games. Similarly, a pitcher that has one bad inning every game giving up 5 runs is a bad pitcher even though he held them scoreless for the rest of the game. Curt Schilling always said that the difference between winning and losing is the execution of 5 or 6 pitches. If you don't execute them, you lose even though you executed most of your other pitchers. You get judged based on results. Fighters that fight great for 10 rounds but suck in the last 2 rounds are never champions. If the Sox finish the fight standing, it is a good job. If they miss the playoffs after spending so much money and having such a big lead, it will be considered a failure. He will not be judged on a small sample size, but on the results at the end of 162+ games. Just like in an election, the results aren't in yet, so we don't know if Theo is a winner or a loser. That's the real world.