Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,239
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. Yeah sure. He can't even remember how many outs there are. Francona will look like John McGraw and Connie Mack rolled into.
  2. Bard IMO is the best choice for closer at this point. These bums and retreads mentioned in the article should not be considered for the closer job and they would scare me as the 8th inning guy. At this point, I am inclined to go with Aceves for the 8th and take the huge step down in performance from what we have enjoyed for the last couple of years in the 8th inning. Maybe Jenks loses a 100 lbs by spring training so he's only overweight by 50 lbs and he can give some quality late innings. As for Lidge, Nathan, and Broxton, I have very little no more faith in them than I do in Jenks.
  3. From today's Herald. The highlighted portion scares me: Nathan, Lidge or Broxton? The late innings will be real cliffhangers if these are our options. Broxton flat out sucks. He lost his confidence and he has been a repeat visitor to the DL. He's Eric Gagne --Part II. Lidge will keep the cardiac care centers filled to capacity in Boston during the baseball season. Joe Nathan is damaged goods-- straight from the dumpster.
  4. I would trade Ellsbury for Verlander, but probably not any other pitcher. Verlander really had a break out year. What an arm!
  5. 6 years $90 million is not a bad deal. I still think he will get more. Ben continues to sit with thumb firmly planted in his ass. We have no manager, coaching staff and still no compensation from the Cubs.
  6. Wow! The feeding frenzy is growing. I hope you all are having fun.
  7. I guess my recollection about the discussion was mistaken. I had remembered being challenged on the seriousness of the Mets financial condition. Maybe it was another poster. You say that you have been igmoring me and I certainly have not engaged you. Yet, you took this opportunity to take a few unsolicited swipes at me. That's not in the spirit of not engaging with me. In fact, under the rules of the forum, it is considered baiting.
  8. Wow, I didn't think he was being condescending at all. What's going on with all the lashing out E1? Seriously.
  9. I figured that I would take that route as opposed to the open mocking in which you were engaged.
  10. Even if Bard fills Papelbon's shoes, we have no one to fill Bard's shoes.
  11. I think Yeszir might be pulling our leg.:dunno:
  12. I wish the FO would just man up one of these times and state that the guy was not in their plans. They let Damon take a beating from the fans and be booed mercilessly for years, when the truth be told, they didn't want him. This case is even worse. They never presented Papelbon with any offer, nor did they make any effort to communicate to him that they were interested in keeping him.
  13. He's driving on the same highway as Mo like you said.
  14. E1, you never responded to this. Am I on the right track with this?
  15. Take what lightly? What are you talking about? Intellectually dishonest? If I'm wrong, I admit it.:dunno: If the GM is wrong about the same thing, it still goes against his record.
  16. Most self professed arrogant know it alls are.:dunno: I'm real smart and good looking too. Are you trying to get me to feel bad about myself?
  17. I can only have it one way-- either I am right or I am wrong. The same goes for Ben. If we are both wrong, my being wrong doesn't cancel out his mistake. He would still be wrong. You know the old saying about "two wrongs..." Unfortunately for Ben, he has to answer to JH. Still not sure I get your point. Shrugs.
×
×
  • Create New...