If the FO has no confidence in Bard as a closer and is still seriously considering him as a starter, then the Papelbon move makes even less sens. Without Bard in the closer or 8th inning role, the bullpen will be in shambles. I don't think Heath Bell can be signed for 2 years when a broken down warhorse like Nathan got 2 years. I don't like giving Bell 3 years, because he is 34. If they do that, why didn't they give a 30 year old Papelbon 4 years. Their plan is very unclear at this point. Their direction should start to take shape in the next couple of weeks.
As for the thought of Kalish and Reddick platooning, a lefty-lefty platoon makes little sense. IMO one of these guys will stick and the other will be packaged in a trade.