The problem is that this staff doesn't have a big # 1 horse who will go deep into games, I.e. the 7th or 8th inning in most of his starts. A guy like that takes a tremendous amount of pressure off the pen and the rest of the staff. The Red Sox, at best have two number 2's and a 3. Some would argue that we have a 2, 3 and 4. A staff without 1 or 2 big innings eaters needs the bottom of its rotation to be better than it would need to be if we had a true ace and innings eater. The fact that Bard is doing as well as the average #5 is irrelevant, because this team needs an above average #5 if it wants to make a run at the playoffs. Another issue is that Bard is seemingly going backward as his velocity and performance is getting worse, not better. He's going to be shut down at some point-- probably at 150 innings. At that point, we will need another starter. Will that be Dice K? I'm not so sure. Finally, I think it is legitimate point of view that this is poor asset management--- taking a well above average/dominant reliever and turning him into an average #5 starter. I thought the long term plan was to turn him into an above average starter. He has shown no flashes of that yet. He has yet to put together a dominant performance. If all he is going to be is an average #5, I don't see the point of the experiment. There are plenty of those guys available.