Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,329

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    Lester being our obvious #1 underscores why we are a suckass last place team.
  2. a700hitter
    What makes you think I hate doubront? I am concerned that his last 2 months of 2012 was not just fatigue, but he has earned the 5th spot unless Lackey can turn back the clock and pitch like he did for the Angels.
  3. a700hitter
    If Myers is close to being in the same league as Harper or Trout, KC would be insane to trade him for Lester who pitched to a 5 1/2 ERA. Without looking, he was probably the worst #1 in all of baseball. Many teams have better #2's, and no, I don't know which of them are available, and neither does anyone else. The Royals could sign Haren for about the same money as Lester will be making for the next 2 seasons without giving up such an elite talent.
  4. a700hitter
    You are penciling in Lester as our #1?
  5. a700hitter
    But they were can't miss prospects and those don' t get traded.
  6. a700hitter
    I agree with all your comments on the lineup, but I am not sure what you mean by scary when referring to Ross/Lavarnway. Do you mean scary good or bad?
  7. a700hitter
    If he's in the same league as the other 2 guys, they are not going to trade him, because the major flaw in your argument is that Lester is no #1.
  8. a700hitter
    So then he is not the kind of prospect that Harper and Trount were.
  9. a700hitter
    None of their other "elite" hitters are as good as Jeter, Garciaparra, or ARod, so why would they trade a guy as good as them?
  10. a700hitter
    If he is that good, KC will not trade him.
  11. a700hitter
    That's probably the 2 that I would go with.
  12. a700hitter
    It doesn't matter whether he can throw the ball if he can' t catch it. His defense has been described as possibly not major league level. He is not a base stealer, so he is 1 dimensional insofar as he can only hit.
  13. a700hitter
    You are right. They did such a thorough job of running the franchise into the ground that the closer doesn't matter.
  14. a700hitter
    I'm okay with 2 of the 3, but the 3 one would be overkill and not add much. We need a first baseman, so Napoli or swisher would fill the bill, and each can play another position. We don't need them bot if Ross is re-signed to play the OF. I have posted my wish list several times. We need a first baseman, an outfielder, but most of all we need pitching.
  15. a700hitter
    I have been beating the drum that I think he will make moves, but does that men that I have to like the moves? I don't see the point in getting all 3 of these guys. They are not terrible moves, but I don't think they will improve the team much for the cost.
  16. a700hitter
    I don't think these 3 will add much in the aggreegate.
  17. a700hitter
    More from Cherington yesterday. People can debate whether he is being patient or indecisive. Will other GM's beat him to the punch or avoid bad contracts?
  18. a700hitter
    Maybe the report(s) that i am recollecting said average speed, but the report was that he was 1 dimensional, not a multi tool guy like Harper or Trout.
  19. a700hitter
    Bells, I don't think it is even arguable that he is the greatest closer in Red Sox history. If you remember Lynn and Fisk, you remember the lat inning horrors of 1976. That team lost something like 30+ games after the 6th inning. They tried to buy Hall of Famer Rollie Fingers to stem the tide. But for the horrendous late inning bullpen, that team would have won the division. I remember when all time greats like Lynn and Fisk were sent packing over salary issues. My heart sank. I am still waiting for the next Fisk and the next rookie like Lynn. The great ones are not easily replaceable. Here's the bottom line with Papelbon. He is a great closer and the best in our history. The FO had made so many other bad high priced decisions that they could not afford him. If they had managed their house better, they would have been able to keep Papelbon. Papelbon didn't get a bad contract. The FO gave away some terrible contracts for years before he left.
  20. a700hitter
    Myers is also reported to be just barely an adequate fielder and he has no speed. He is a1 dimensional player.
  21. a700hitter
    And he was the best, most consistent 3 out closer in Red Sox history. A comparable replacement may take many years. For a manager, being able to pencil in his numbers year after year made Tito's job a lot easier. Now, the 9th inning will be a crap shoot for years. You pay a premium for that certainty. People can point to Rodney as a cheap alternative. The Rays got very lucky with him, and with his inconsistent history, there is no guarantee what he will give them this year. When your closer blows up, it can take a sledge hammer to your season. I think iortiz or another poster asked what other closers have had such a consistent run of excellence like Papelbon. I think currently no one rivals his current run.
  22. a700hitter
    And Mo Rivera blew game 7 of the 2001 World Series. I wish the Yankees let him walk after that.
  23. a700hitter
    This statement from Cherington today is distressing. I think he is missing the boat. IMO, the biggest need for this team for 2 seasons has been starting pitching. I am not in agreement with him if he thinks we can roll out the same guys and the pitching will improve.
  24. a700hitter
    I think you might be remembering 2010. Papelbon did not give up a lot of base runners in 2011.
  25. a700hitter
    I think it would be an extremely foolish move for the FO to accept another last place 90+ loss season to get better draft position. So, much work goes into establishing a strong valuable franchise that it would be pure folly to willingly send out an inferior product. The current management set the bar very high on all fronts. They have the highest ticket prices in baseball plus they have Numerous other lucrative income streams. The fuel for this engine is fan interest. This is not Minnesota that has specials for 4 tickets, 4 hot dogs, 4 beers and parking for $40. As you said, people are not going to spend $200+ to go to Fenway to see a 90 + loss team again. They just will not. I just can't see any business willingly damaging it's franchise and watching its revenue streams take big hits for a couple of years in hopes that they discover the next great generational talent. That's just not reasonable. Do you know how long it will take them to recoup the lost revenue. Years.
×
×
  • Create New...