Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. The rumormill just keeps flip-flopping on Young to the Red Sox
  2. Big hug to you and Taylor and John Lackey.
  3. I kept trying, but the guy is in a constant state of agitation like a rabid dog. I'm done with him, not even a peek at his posts. There's plenty of baseball knowledge here to enjoy without engaging him. He should go find his recent ally, SR and join up with him someplace else.
  4. Such a dick. Go take your meds. I try to tolerate you but you make everything a fight. To ignore with you. For good.
  5. No need to get pissy all the time. I was just clarifying my position. I didn't want my posts getting misconstrued into people thinking that I am anti -Peavy. It was a clarification for the whole forum, not just for you. Everything is not always about you, man.
  6. I am not complaining about Peavy. I am arguing about these statistical gymanstics being used to predict his performance when he has had a decent body of work in the AL that would give the best indication when taken as a whole. Peavy's problems are not his stuff or his performance. It is his health.
  7. or maybe he is closer to the 4.00 ERA that he has ppitched to in 537 innings in the AL.
  8. Would you change your signature?
  9. It looks like Young will be our third baseman
  10. THis is a useful stat.
  11. Don't we disagree about enough?
  12. The outliers are included when determining the averages. It's a much more effective way of establishing a level of performance than to pull out the bad starts and the good starts. I just don't see the value in that analysis. If someone wants to present evidence that the Chicago team has terrible defensive range thus allowing more hits, that would be encouraging to me. Just taking out a bad start and calling it an outlier is bogus to me. You can disagree.
  13. I would really like to pick up Howie Kendrick to play 3rd. He would be the incumbent next year unless WMB can win the job-- then Kendrick could move to 1st.
  14. I don't qagree that there are outliers, unless the guy was pitching with an eyepatch or against a team using aluminum bats. You measure a pitcher by his full body of work. There is no cherry picking. Like I said, if he was in a hot streak now, that would be valid, because maybe he made an adjustment to improve his performance. Normal seasonal ups and downs just factor into overall performance.
  15. If he wanted to say that he is pitching better lately, that is a legitimate argument, but the stats he put up didn't support that argument. He didn't show a progression of increasing good outings. He just pulled out the bad start. That's just not a valid measure of anything.
  16. I read it. I don't agree with it. Her's a question that I ask people when they tell me that a pitcher had a good outing except for one bad inning. Do you know what you call a pitcher who has one bad inning (4 or more runs) every start? A bad pitcher.
  17. Take awayv his bad start and he is a very good pitcher? I don't think it works that way.
  18. It depends on how things turn out.
  19. He would take ABs away from Gomes. I don't think that he would be such an upgrade over Gomes to justify making the deal.
  20. Iggy made a big impression on me during Spring Training. He had completely re-tooled his swing , and he was swinging the bat with authority. He was no longer a slap hitter. In Spring Training, he was hitting the ball hard but did not get results. When he got his chance with the big club, the hits started falling in at a very high rate. Recently, that started to normalize, but I don't think he will go back to being an offensive black hole. With Iggy leaving, it seems that some people think that we will see Bogaerts at age 20 (a la Machado for the O's last year). That would be exciting if he injects the energy that Machado did last year. I guess that Middlebrooks is an option, but I am not sure that they will want to risk inserting a black hole into a power slot in the lineup. I don't see Snyder as an option. The trade market also has to be a possibility.
  21. LOL! Good point. The shoe is on the other foot this time. Those trades for nothing always seem to coincide with the player's rejuvenation for the Skanks. I hope that we have the same results.
  22. if we win the championship, I'll never look back at the trade. I never thought about Hanley after 2007. I wouldn't care if he beat every record in the book. The same goes for anyone who gets traded to get us another championship in 2013.
×
×
  • Create New...