We both posted over at SOSH. We know it very well, probably better than you do. Fact is, it gets old, and I think we are tired of ALWAYS looking at it through saber minds, which is why we came back here. I think sabers are the ones who have a hard time looking at the game with an outside view becuase they are too busy calculating the thousands of formulas to back up arguments. You can find any mathmatical significance if you look hard enough and nobody has been able to put together a formula which equals a good ballplayer, or a good team. Look at Oakland for instance, Billy ball gets them into the playoffs, nothing more. What has Mark Bellhorn done since leaving Boston? The thing is, all those calculations looked great when he was doing well in Boston, and everyone fell in love with sabermetrics, but does that indicate how good of a ballplayer Bellhorn is? No. Its very subjective and fun to talk about but in the end its no more accurate than any other theory, which is in itself argumentative. There is no formula for success, sometimes the numbers work out, sometimes they dont, but its when stat heads insult people who have just as much insight that I have a problem with. I am a very educated baseball mind and know all about sabermetrics, but came to the conclusion that it is not the end all for baseball discussion. People at SOSH dont understand that.