[table=Mussina '95 vs. Dice '07]Name| H9 | HR9 | BB9 | K9
Moose|7.59|0.97|2.03|6.42
Dice|8.28|0.47|3.55|9.24[/table]
The big negative for Dice is the BB/9. But, like I said, the thing holding him back is the Mr Hyde inning which is characterized by an inordinate amount of walks. He doesn't struggle with command unless he gets upset by the ump, a lot like Moose himself only worse. Again, I've said it is the one thing holding him back. Of his 15 BB this year, 9 have come in 3 innings. That is the corner he must turn. If he can, there's no doubt he can put a seasonal line better than Moose did in '95. Moose pitched to a 3.87 FIP in '95 with those rates. Dice's is 3.26 right now. No doubt in my mind he can do it at all. It will take some maturation and a little luck, like Moose was that year, but dismissing it as not possible shows your complete lack of statistical analysis skills. Objective enough for you?
And this doesn't address the change in scope of the discussion. You started this out saying he doesn't have the talent. That's wrong, the talent is there, but it won't be seen in the results until he gets beyond the one flaw he's shown. Of course, you can't see the difference in talent and performance. They are related, but there isn't a perfect correlation between the two. Look at Felix Hernandez last year. Immense talent, but not very good performance. For the other side of it consider Aaron Small from '05. Not much talent, but insane performance for you guys.
No matter how sweetly you ask, I'm not touching your jock. Seek gratification elsewhere, you butt monkey.
Check my posts re: Matsuzaka. I never bought into the hype and was skeptical of how he'd perform until I saw him. I like what I see minus the headcase issue, but I'm pretty confident he can overcome that.
I think this is commonly found among mental patients. The rest of the world just doesn't get their brilliance. Might want to think about admitting yourself so you can find an audience that actually thinks you have a clue.