Re: the opinons, whatever the hell those are...
The good:
1. Yep, they are in better shape than I would have guessed if you told me Ortiz would have been out for over a month (and sucked for the first month).
2. Francona's "getting the ball to Papelbon" is a bit of misnomer. He's had several opportunities to either reduce or eliminate the opponents chances in a close game on the road by using Papelbon before the 9th with a lead or in the 9th without the lead and failed to do so every time, and then subsequently used Papelbon the next day with a 4+ run lead. Horrible usage of the best reliever by leverage. He gets no nod from me there. And, while Oki has been bad, he hasn't entered fluke territory yet. That will happen when he can throw his split-change for strikes and still gets hit like he is now. It was the pitch that made him so effective last year and early this year. For some reason, he completely lost the feel for it in May.
The bad:
1. See #2 from "The good".
2. Brian Fuentes would be a nice addition, but what does he cost?
3. Sac bunts are outs. The game state expected runs matrix predicts 0.89 runs with a runner on 1st with no outs, and 0.68 with a runner on 2nd with one out. Now, what that doesn't show is that the likelihood of scoring one run is greater in the second scenario. Thus, it makes sense to do it when all you need/want is one run. In most such situations, multiple runs are more desirable/necessary. As for taking 3rd on a single, that is entirely situation dependent. The runner, fielder, and location of the single determine the appropriate amount of aggressiveness. Why risk making an out at 3rd when you can have a runner at 2nd without question?
Carry on.