I'm just not everyone, I guess. I didn't even care if Grady Little was fired after the Pedro thing. It didn't seem like an obvious call to me, despite everyone else's apparently 20/20 vision at the time. I have a hard time knowing who to blame for losses in baseball when it is so hard to know who to blame for wins. If the professionals on this team didn't come through, then I would blame the professionals. Not the guy who hired the staff that ended up coming up a hair short.
Does Mike Krzyzewski get blamed for not winning the tournament every year if Duke gets to the Elite 8? No. How about John Schuerholz in Atlanta? It is understood that at times the ball bounces strangely or people get injured, or whatever, but that the best you can do is put your team in a place to win. This front office (and other front offices, including I bet the Yankees) starts the season with a wins goal. They hope to attain that goal. If they get there they will be happy, if they don't they won't. This team's goal is uaually in the mid 90's in wins. They should attain that this year. The past few years they have attained their goal (except for 06), one of those years it all went well, others it didn't go as well.
The Red Sox are playing like they should be expected to. They are currently 19 games above .500. The Yankees have SHAT the bed. If they yankees come back it is because they are a good team who SHOULD finish the season with a W% in the .600, not because the Sox choked and gave up some enormous lead. if the Sox finish with a .600+ w% and don't win the division there will be no heads rolling.
Well... follow through with your thought... why is Brian Cashman still GMing that team? He has destroyed expectations as well.
I agree, if there is somethign to be done. You don't need to make moves just to make moves. By the end of the season Tavarez should not be in the rotation. Other than that I'm unsure what will happen. I remember back in 2004 this team literally had Abe Alverez to come up for a spot start. This team has probably 5 pitchers who have seen MLB action before who could come up from the minors or bullpen to start (Hansack, Gabbard, Pauley, Lester, Snyder). ALL of them are better options than the once highly touted Abe Alverez was.
Tell that to the Oakland A's.
Yes, you have to prepare for it as well as you can. But given that there aren't any obvious better options I don't know what that answer is. This is such a stupid argument, because you're trying to criticize a GM who REFUSED TO EXTEND SCHILLING'S CONTRACT because he won't let him go or stop using him at midseason!!! He knows that Schilling doesn't have a whole lot left. He is exploring other options, but please, please, PLEASE name a starter who is more effective than Schilling and who is available.
Schilling in April:
3-1, 3.27 ERA, 33 IP, 23 K
Schilling in May
2-1, 4.03 ERA, 38 IP, 37 K
His first two months were certainly solid enough for a #3 pitcher. He just took a few weeks off, says he's feeling healthy, I'm prone to believe that he can be a 4-4.5 ERA guy the rest of the way.
Or a recipe for adjustment. Let's see: his career is on the line, he's a smart pitcher who--even in 04--had to adjust compared to his old style. Do you think he will stubbornly proceed with the same strategy, or try to change? Hmmm, well, since he's a stupid Red Sox I know which way you would vote.
I agree that this would be nice, at the right price.
He's old and needed some rest to be effective down the stretch.
A diplomatic answer. YOu aren't alone no matter what side you take on the Schilling situation. Most pundits and analysts would most likely choose to have Schilling in the rotation over any of the "back end of the rotation" guys you're talking about.
I agree. My view is that Clay Buchholz could be that answer, as teams haven't seen him before, he's got electric stuff and it appears that Phil Hughes--who is considerably younger--is clearly going to be able to do the job. Buchholz might not be the best option, but he'll be more than fine as a #5 addition to this team or spot starting out of the pen.