Fair enough, I would agree with that 100%
Article was an interesting read though..
There are two big pieces of evidence...they're called your eyes. There are no statistics to evaluate natural talent, but just watch Cano play and his talent is undeniable. The most talented players aren't always the best, and there are tons of examples of that. Look at Derek Jeter for instance, there are plenty of players in the game, and at his position, who are more talented than Jeter. But there are few players in the game better than him. Nobody who's saying that Cano is more talented is arguing against the point that Pedroia is the better player.
That's because he is, as a player, superior to Cano. That's undeniable. But somebody's worth as a player isn't just defined by their physical ability, because if it was Cano would be better. Remember, 90% of baseball is half-mental
touche lol
I absolutely hate it. It's not as supportive as people make it to be sometimes. It's alright for reference sometimes, but it's legs aren't strong enough to be so supportive when making a case for something. It's unfortunate that there isn't a more reliable defensive stat though.