Ellsbury:
What makes you think the Hornets will take a step back. There really is no basis to that arguement. Paul is the best young point guard in the game. West and Peja are great 2 and 3 scorers, and the addition of Posey runs out a great bench.
Williams isn't better than Gibson? Williams has averaged 17/6 the last 2 years, Gibson can't hold a candle to these numbers, let alone the fact that Williams is a better playmaker. Not sure why you don't like this move, but he's a huge upgrade over Gibson and West, and it lets West move over to his more natural 2 position, and lets Gibson stay on the bench where he's better served as an overall player.
How will the Hawks not make it? They're better than last year by virture of being healthy. All five of their starters will only get better, especially Bibby. Their bench might be horrific, but the other three teams down there are all either just as paper thin (Indy), have too many injury problems (Wizards), or just don't have it (Bulls).
Chalmers won't be surprising anyone. He played at Kansas throughout his career where he had many, MANY, weapons at his disposal. Here, he doesn't have nearly as much. Blount isn't a real center, and will get eaten alive by everyone in this conference outside of Rasho Nesterovic. Jamaal Magloire? He hasn't done anything worth noting since '06. He's not going to be a critical piece at all.
Yes, I did watch Indy last year, and what I see in them is a team that doesn't mesh well at all with each other, and their coach, Jim O'Brien. Not only do they not have a single big impact player, but they don't play well enough defense to the point where O'Brien can't coach to his strengths. Hibbert will be a good backup center with time, but he's not going to have an impact this year, and FYI, Marquise Daniels and Jamaal Tinsley are not good basketball players.
I don't see Gordon as good enough to take over late in games because he simply can't create for himself. He can take over a few here and there, but he's not that good where he can do it based on his shooting alone on a nightly basis.
Where was New Orleans the year before this? They were playing some home games in Oklahoma City, Speedy Claxton and Desmond Mason were their two best players over there aside from Paul and West. Paul and West are both improved, they have a great 3rd scorer in Peja, Peterson and Chandler both fit well, and their bench is pretty solid. I can't see why they'd get any worse and regress.
I feel like Bynum will feel like he's entitled to touches. The guy played 35 games last year and averaged something like 13/10 a game, and he wants 17 million dollars. Is he crazy?!? He certainly thinks he's worth more than he is, and I expect it to carry onto the court.
If you watched the Suns last year, Amare was perfectly fine in the half court sets. He's more athletic and quicker than the guys guarding him, so they'll have no problem doing it. This will put less wear on Shaqs' body as well, and Nash will thrive in this system.
The Spurs not having a great bench will catch up to them. They've had the same team the last 3 years, and they've regressed a bit each year, and I think that will continue, especially in the strong West. Their bench is mediocre as hell this year.
No sense in comparing the Clippers to the Celtics. I said they'd finish 8th, not 1st. Davis and Camby bring scoring, playmaking, and defense to the table, and add that with Kaman, an improving Thornton, and Mobley, I think they have what it takes to finish 8th. Ricky Davis will be great for their bench, because he'll be getting most of the touches on the offensive end.