Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm just curious what some of you think about Ellsbury hitting further down in the order. He's been a lot more productive in the 7th and 8th spots in the order, hitting a combined .404, getting on base in almost half his plate appearances, and slugging well over .500. Should the Red Sox leave him there, or try to move him back to the top of the order and see if his .400+ on base percentage translates to the leadoff spot.
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I would leave him there personally. He makes things happen from the bottom of the order and that's important too. I wouldn't mess with what works.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Since Ellsbury went down in the order a few things have changed. The SP approach for one. With Ellsbury at the top of the order he had Pedroia/Youk/Bay(some combo). Add that with his speed and if Ellsbury got on, it was likely to lead to a run. Thats why SP got aggressive with Ellsbury, and made him swing. They threw him a lot of strikes, as a result his OBP suffered. Because it was either going to be a hit or an out.

 

Now that he is down in the order and the hitters behind him don't look so scary, pitchers seem to be pitching him a little normal. Which has allowed him to get deeper into counts, and also draw more walks. Maybe the increase of pitches he's seeing has helped make his overall PA better.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Ellsbury and Green at 8-9 are about as good as it gets

 

I imagine you never thought you'd be saying that back in April.

Posted
I imagine you never thought you'd be saying that back in April.

 

Ellsbury not so much, I expected him to hover around .300/.350 this year but with Green, I never thought he'd still be this effective with the bat (and now with the glove) going into July. BTW, any idea when the last Sox player hit two triples in a game was?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Ellsbury not so much' date=' I expected him to hover around .300/.350 this year but with Green, I never thought he'd still be this effective with the bat (and now with the glove) going into July. BTW, any idea when the last Sox player hit two triples in a game was?[/quote']

 

They actually said during the broadcast that it was, of all people, David Ortiz in '04. I guess he really found the gaps that night

Posted
They actually said during the broadcast that it was' date=' of all people, David Ortiz in '04. I guess he really found the gaps that night[/quote']

 

Yup, just looked it up. He did it on July 22nd, 2004 in the first game of a doubleheader against Baltimore, two days before the brawl/Mueller walkoff game against NY. He must've dropped it into the triangle twice. He hit 3 triples all year in '04 too.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Since Ellsbury went down in the order a few things have changed. The SP approach for one. With Ellsbury at the top of the order he had Pedroia/Youk/Bay(some combo). Add that with his speed and if Ellsbury got on, it was likely to lead to a run. Thats why SP got aggressive with Ellsbury, and made him swing. They threw him a lot of strikes, as a result his OBP suffered. Because it was either going to be a hit or an out.

 

Now that he is down in the order and the hitters behind him don't look so scary, pitchers seem to be pitching him a little normal. Which has allowed him to get deeper into counts, and also draw more walks. Maybe the increase of pitches he's seeing has helped make his overall PA better.

 

I've been stressing the fact that the way pitches work Ellsbury when he's batting first negatively affects his ability to draw walks, and his production batting 7th in the order justifies my theory.

Posted
I've been stressing the fact that the way pitches work Ellsbury when he's batting first negatively affects his ability to draw walks' date=' and his production batting 7th in the order justifies my theory.[/quote']

 

I wuv myself.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I wuv myself.

 

Hey, i got called out for saying that.

 

Now don't you dare interfere with my delicious "lol im rite" time, ya filthy canadian. :D

Posted
ya filthy canadian.

 

pffft, go spend more time building a case for that guy who bashed the other guy over the head with a coconut

Old-Timey Member
Posted
pffft' date=' go spend more time building a case for that guy who bashed the other guy over the head with a coconut[/quote']

 

Lol from you?

 

Seriously?

 

Canada's my reminder that no matter how s***** my country is, it could be worse.

 

After all, you are:

 

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2387/2198259774_baed018f2b.jpg

Posted

the argument that DR is better than Canada is valid? rly?

 

any country that has chickens walking around freely is automatically disqualified from arguing superiority over another country.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
the argument that DR is better than Canada is valid? rly?

 

any country that has chickens walking around freely is automatically disqualified from arguing superiority over another country.

 

Spoken like a person who has never, ever, ever, been to this country.

 

Like any other country, there are rural areas, but here in Santo Domingo, what you'll mostly are skyscrapers and expensive cars.

 

Besides, there is no poutine.

Posted
Spoken like a person who has never' date=' ever, ever, been to this country.[/quote']

 

been 3 times.

 

http://www.timothyrmason.org/2007-04-03-santo-domingo-skyline.jpg

 

yea, check out those skyscrapers....almost like looking at a latino manhattan

Old-Timey Member
Posted
been 3 times.

 

None to Santo Domingo or Santiago, then.

 

You should let me know if you ever come here again.

 

I'll take you clubbing around Lincoln avenue, it'll change your whole opinion of the DR and you will want to stay and live here.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
honestly' date=' I love your country and I've had some of the best times of my life in your country.[/quote']

 

This place is awesome, and would be even better if not for the s***** wealth distribution.

 

Here, where people are rich, they're filthy, Forbes magazine f***ing rich, but when they're poor, well, your picture describes it perfectly.

Posted
the argument that DR is better than Canada is valid? rly?

 

any country that has chickens walking around freely is automatically disqualified from arguing superiority over another country.

Black women = major win.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
DR > Canada' date=' but this made LOL hard.[/quote']

 

I contend that any awesome joke he might make is automatically neutralized by the " Canada:America's hat" pic.

 

Just sayin'.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
but if Canada is America's hat' date=' what would that make the DR? America's colostomy bag?[/quote']

 

Not your best work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...