That's ok for a small market team willing to wallow in the basement for another three to five years. Building a contender around an ace isn't new, though, and I'm only going to use my experience as a Red Sox fan for proof. It goes beyond just acquiring a piece to put them over the top, like Sale and/or Price.
In 1997, the Sox' record was 78-84 -- the exact same W-L as this past season, except they finished two games out of last place. Then they traded for Pedro Martinez, and he immediately changed the entire culture in Boston.
In 1983, the Sox' record was again 78-84 -- bad enough for 6th place (in a 7-team AL East), 20 games out of first. The next year was Roger Clemens' rookie year, and he soon changed the entire culture in Boston.
From 1968-71, the Red Sox won around 86 games per year, but finished between 17 and 22 games back. They could hit, but never had a real ace pitcher. Then beginning in 1972, they had Luis Tiant atop the rotation, and they were contenders the rest of the decade.
All these guys were true aces, innings eaters, bullpen savers, and studs to supplement with other #2s and #3s. There were always plenty of candidates to step into the latter roles, where less pressure existed...