Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    54,638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. Yeah that’s not really what it says...
  2. Well the man’s bat was certainly a factor in keeping him in the lineup
  3. Gold Gloves have always been the most questionable award, highlighted by the awarding of one to Rafael Palmeiro in a season where he was almost exclusively a DH. But I guess when players and coaches vote, that’s what happens. He really wasn’t the worst, but a big part of the reason are the two players I mentioned. Jeter has dozens of counterparts capable of doing everything he did on the field. And in many cases, more than he did. Were than any other worse shortstops I forgot? Jhonny Peralta and his 0 Gold Gloves would be the epitome of the “no range but makes the routine plays consistently” shortstop...
  4. I actually would say he was closer to being the worst than the best - although some minimum innings criteria is needed. Consistency is nice, but it puts you in the pack; it doesn’t desperate you from it. That range is negated by current strategies (which isn’t true at all) is irrelevant here since those strategies were not employed during Jeter’s career. But really, when trying to disprove who or what was the worst or best or really, any extreme, it’s not readily disproved by describing what makes it ordinary. Now one better method would be to say who was worse. FWIW, I wouldn’t say Jeter was the worst defensive shortstop of his era, either. But I might say he was the worst one not named “Hanley” or “Yuniesky”....
  5. Or the movie could focus on ERod and be called “A Force of One.” If ERod does get hurt, the title could be “And Then There Were None”...
  6. Better news for Pirates’ fans
  7. Yes. With 1b being largely regarded as the “easiest” position...
  8. Well look around MLB. Nearly every team has a starter who changed positions at the MLB level.
  9. He has. Really to me, the best defensive 3b of the two should play 3b. Dalbec is taller, which is an advantage at 1b. Or maybe Dalbec is trade bait. 1b doesn’t strike me as a tough spot to fill...
  10. It really does happen all the time. We have fans on this board screaming for JD Martinez to grab a 1b mitt. Look around the league. Players change positions on every team. And on most teams, the only player you need to look at is the 1b...
  11. True. Our posts are inconsequential and meaningless. The difference is, I can only make suggestions based on what I see as players and some stats, because taking the personalities of people I don’t know and have never met into account is tantamount to guesswork. I do realize many and probably nearly all players are insanely confident and have some sort of “nothing I can’t do” mentality, so typically the notion of change isn’t a big deal. In fact, my guess would be that players without that mentality struggle to ever make MLB regardless of talent. After all, if no one ever changed positions, three quarters of the league would be shortstops...
  12. They’re even married to the same woman...
  13. Tell that to Moreland and Pearce...
  14. I assumed nothing and my original idea made no mention of Devers reaction. That was your input. “Employees” plural might be resistant to change. But that doesn’t mean every individual is. And when it comes to MLB players, they change positions far more often than you realize. It’s a safe bet that the starting lineup of every MLB team has at least one player who has changed positions since AAA ball. Most probably have more....
  15. It’s not about opinions. It’s about other possibilities. I know a lot of fans write off the stats guys as missing the “human element” of the game. But a really big part of the human element isn’t assuming all people react the same to the same situations. Humans are more than a collection of sweeping generalizations...
  16. I think the bigger factor in moving Betts to the outfield was the horrific start to his career at the plate by Jackie Bradley Jr. This also may have been a significant factor in signing Rusney Castillo. I don’t think it’s fair to say moving his position is the wrong message or a blow to his confidence. That’s the kind of thing you’d have to know Devers to be sure of. He also might look at it like “Hey they think I can do anything.”...
  17. I doubt Devers would struggle much with the change, just like Betts didn’t struggle much (or at all) when moved to the OF...
  18. I think so too. The Nationals did OK without Harper...
  19. Some ballplayers are certainly superstitious, and some probably about position. But Devers might not be. Not sure if the Sox have ever asked him about changing positions before...
  20. Liking Kiluchi for 2b. The Sox won’t get him, but apparently he is a very exciting player...
  21. Then the Sox should deal him. They’re only going to win it all if all three human arm slings are healthy. But they can deal Betts for some useful players not found within the Sox organization and maybe be that much better in 2021 and beyond...
  22. At this point, average seasons might mean 70 IP...
  23. To be specific, what Scott Boras thought the market would be compared to his current salary...
  24. Better at 3b than 1b or better at 3b than Dalbec?
  25. I’ve frequently posted Dalbec as trade bait. But if the Sox move Devers to 1b, put Dalbec at 3b, and deal Chavis for a useful piece (pitcher? Outfielder?), that makes sense too
×
×
  • Create New...