I think it was 1968 when Gibson was never taken out of a game from the mound. The only time he came out all season was for a pinch hitter. Otherwise, it was all complete games.
You make crappy pitches, they will get hit. The Tigers also got several infield and other soft hits in this series. Any player will tell you sometimes those will get you out of a funk and maybe some of those got some Tigers going a little bit. They played aggressively in the base paths.
Detroit started the year by going 6-6 against Cleveland, Minnesota and Houston (sweeping the Astros in Texas). That may very well be their limit as far as their good streaks go this season, but they will have a few streaks like it over the course of the season. I hate playing teams that come in a 2-16 slump (or whatever they were) because no team can play that badly forever and they will come out of it at some point.
I'm more concerned over the overall sloppiness of the Sox in multiple phases of the game.
Pitching gave up 3 runs in regulation. Overall, it was fine. Whitlock didn’t have it tonight. Whether it was the moment or it was just a bad night remains to be seen.
Exactly; the only advantage the away team would have is that in theory, they can use their closer to finish things up if they score. But that’s no different than the old rules.
When I was growing up in Southern Connecticut, we could get Met games on WOR Channel 9. I remember one afternoon, I want to say 1974 or 1975, I began watching a Mets-Giants game and told myself I’d watch until
the no-hitters were broken up. A couple hours later, Ed Halicki completed a no-no.
It’s the only one I’ve ever seen from start to finish.
Well, since you asked so nicely, NO.
Actually, I use ignore for posters who post complete drivel; you don’t do that.
You may, however, think about developing a thicker skin. Feel free to have the last word.
As the “pussy” you are referring to, all I’ll say is: ooh, another internet tough guy resorting to name calling because someone has the temerity to disagree with him.
Still waiting on your response on where I make things up, but I knew you’d never follow through on that.
Right, because a kid who has thrown 0 innings above AA (and only 70 innings at that level) should be thrown to the wolves ASAP. And if he failed, you’d have been the first one with the pitchfork saying why did we take this schmuck.
Let’s see what happens when he hits a rough patch (he will) and how he reacts before we anoint him Pedro’s successor, okay?
Maybe he should be saying it to Xander; without his error, Perez is out of that inning. Also struck out weakly with RISP a couple of times.
Wouldn’t even need an interpreter.
Layne hasn’t been stellar tonight; he’s not missing borderline stuff, he’s missing obvious stuff. He’s been bad both ways though, so he’s got that going for him.