moonslav59

I pay attention to our ranking, but don't feel the need to repeat what has been said, over and over. I never implied the reason we are in the middle tier now is only because other owners have gone "nutty." I know JH is the major reason. I do think, that if he spent as much as is minimally to moderately reasonable, we'd still be about 5th to 9th- not 1 to 3 as we were for such a long period. We have never dropped this low, under JH. That is true. Maybe I need to say that more often, but it seems like something everyone knows and says over and over. My point is about trying to predict where JH is going is impossible. While I agree, that a change happened after 2018, many saw it coming. Nobody expected it to last 5-7 years, and I do agree a long term down trend has been underway, but the ups and downs are still going on. What's wrong with pointing that out, and when I do, I always try to provide context. The fact is, we were 3rd in spending in 2021, according to Steve the Ump. We were 6th in 2022, despite adding $15M to the budget. 2021 and 2022 were not a decade ago. They were within the 5-7 year overall decline since 2018. It's not unreasonable to ask those who think budget cuts are going to continue what evidence supports this belief? 2 years in a row of cuts? JH has done that numerous times in 20+ years. Again, I'm not defending JH. I'm not saying he won't cut the budget, even more, this winter and maybe the next, too. I'm only saying we don't know. I'll be more surprised if he spend up to the tax line than if he cuts more. We have so much coming off the books, this winter and I'm sure JH views Gio, Hendriks and Fulmer as like this coming winter spendings & additions, without adding to the current budget. I do also think if Brez spends wisely, we can improve without spending more than 2024, but why should we bet on that? I want us to spend more, just like everyone else. It bothers me, when we don't. It bothers me that we keep dropping in the rankings. I'm not optimistic JH spends big again, but I am optimistic that our young roster is improving before our eyes and should keep improving for 2-3 more year or more. I'm hopeful JH & Co see this, too and will spend when the feel we are 2-3 key pieces away from being a top contender. I think we can be there in 2025 with 3 major additions. My guess is, they do not see it as "the time" to splurge. They probably see 2026 or 2027 as the best time and will try to pull a sham on us again, this winter.

It's interesting to note, that even after the Dodgers spent all that winter money, they still ended up needing some deadline deals to win the ring. I can't imagine many owners going to that length to reach glory. Maybe 2-3 others have come close to this last Dodger attempt, but fell short.

To be clear, I have said that a few owners "going nutty" only accounts for some of the reason for us dropping in the rankings- NOT the whole reason. Surely, JH's tightening of the budget is also a major reason for the drop. There are more teams going over the CBT line than before, so there is merit to my point and position. We increased our budget from $180M to $195M from 2021 to 2022. That was one of JH's biggest increases, but we dropped from 3rd to 6th in the rankings. Clearly, other teams' spending has a strong influence on our drop in rankings. I keep feeling like I have to keep saying that I am not trying to let JH off the hook by providing some facts that try to put it all in context. A BIG PART OF OUR DROP IS ON HENRY! I fully support this position and am pisses as hell at him for this. On "noone is accusing JH of going Pohlad," i disagree, and the couple posters who keep saying they think JH will continue to cut and cut until we are a small market like spender is who most of my posts are directly responding to. They say JH will never hand out a massive contract again, during the same season we just paid Devers way more than the Price deal. The Story deal from 2 years ago was also one of the Sox highest 5 or 6 FA contracts in history. We paid more for Yoshida than Pablo, HRam, Lackey, Porcello and others. Within the context of losing Betts, Bogey, JD, Porcello, Sale, Price and others, it's clearly still a step down in spending big on single players, but it's not fully stopping on big deals as some say or imply. Then, they say, "Well, JH had to keep Devers after losing Betts and Bogey," and that is very true, but did JH or did he not spend very large and long on a player? The answer is yes. Will he again? I don't know. They say we have been cutting "every year," and we have not. I showed how JH has always gone up and down and asked why they feel it is a surity it will always go down, from here on out. I even provided the context behind the big jump from 2020 to 2022 as being a mirage, since the cut was so deep from 2019 to 2020, that it wipes out the increase, afterwards, and that the general trend has been down since even 2018 (not 2019.) I've lengthened the time of cuts a year more than they did by showing that I think 2019 was an actual "cut" budget, because we let Kimbrel and Kelly go and the increase in the budget was just paying more to arb guys plus the Nate re-sign. I think I am giving a fair and balanced account of what JH has done, recently, since 2018 and over his whole era. I'm not defending him, but I'm also not out to crucify him, either. There are several posters, here, that wanted him gone, yesterday. I'm not saying they are wrong for wanting that, or that they have no reason for wanting that, but I disagree that now or yesterday is the time for that. My position is and has been, I don't know if JH will spend big again. I'm not sure why or how my position can be viewed as wrong or slanted. I'm not the one(s) predicting what JH is going to do or not do.

The Athletic projects these FA salaries: $41.5M x 15 Soto $35.2M x 7 Burnes (list Sox as fit) $35M x 3 Snell $29M x 6 Fried (Sox fit) $27M x 7 Alonso $26.6M x 7 Bregman $25M x 6 Adames $23.5 x 6 Santander $28M x 4 Bellinger $25M x 3 Teoscar H $24M x 3 C Walker $22.6M x 3 Manaea & Flaherty $18M x 3 Wacha $21M x 2 Nate (Sox fit) $15M x 4 Scott $14.7M x 3 Profar $14M x 3 Kikuchi (maybe in Sox price range?) $11M x 4 G Torres $17M x 2 Hoskins $16M x 2 O'Neal (Sox only listed fit) & Severino (Sox fit) $13.3M x 3 N Martinez (Sox fit and maybe most likely signing) $14M x 2 J Quintana $11M x 3 Estevez (Sox fit and maybe affordable) $20M x 1 Morton $13M x 2 Pederson & Dugo $12M x 2 B Lowe $9M x 3 J Hoffman (Sox fit) $15M x 1 Goldschmidt $9.3M x 2 C Holmes (Sox) $8.5M x 2 Treinen $10M x 1 Boyd (S0x) $6M x 2 Iggy Other odd bals... Buehler and H S Kim $10m + incentives Bieber: "Low Base Salary w incentives" Monty takes $22.5M option & AZ trades him If our AAV budget is between $35-45M, we could do a lot.... $15M x 4 Scott $13,3M x 3 N Martinez $11M x 3 Esteves This is just over $39M. Sub Nate for Nick at about the same contract number but more AAV ($47M total) Kikuchi, Nick and Tanner would be under $45M AAV Soto & C Holmes is just over $50M AAV. (Trade Abreu, DHam and Fitts for SP) Burnes and Esteves is just over $45M AAV, but Fried and Scott are just under $45M. My choices, if we spend $45M AAV: 1. $15M x 4 Scott, $13.3M x 3 N Martinez, $11M x 3 Esteves + Bieber or Buehler or 2. #13.3M x 3 Nick Martinez, $11M x 3 Estevez, $9,3M x 2 C Holmes, $9M x 3 Hoffman or 3. $18M x Wacha or $21M Nate w $15M Scott and $9M x 3 Hoffman

The first guy is perfect for another dice roll pitcher: the second squeezes a good OF'er off the roster.

Agreed, and there is no indication we make more moves than half the teams, this winter. Other teams, especially the Dodgers, have more players returning from injury, but we may have more than most: Gio, Henriks, Fulmer, plus maybe more from Story, Casas, Devers, Slaton, Whitlock, and more. Not many teams have more promising top ranked prospects at ML-readiness. If we can keep pace with off season outside additions, I think we can be top 10-12, at worst. Barring a mess of injuries, of course.

I think you give more credit to 17 other team's rosters, right now.

I kinda think Brez did fine filling our RHB OF slot with O'Neill at less than $6M, while trading the cancerous remaining one year of Dugo for Fitts, Weissert and Judice. We might not need a 3 year guy, if Anthony comes through, and we also have Campbell, who could play OF, FT, or play 2B vs LHPs and CF vs RHPs.

I agree on none of our prospects being added to the 40, unless it's also to the 26 as a FT player or near FT role. I think Campbell might have the best chance to start or be added day 2, once someone gets placed on the 60 IL. I think Anthony would be the #1, if we trade Abreu or Rafaela, or as some suggest, Duran. I do see both making it to the 40, 26 and bigs by mid season. If everyone is healthy, starting Story at SS and having a DHam-Grissom platoon at 2B makes sense. If not OF'er is traded, I could see starting with Duran/Ref LF -Rafaela/Duran CF- Abreu RF could be the plan for opening day.

The thing is, we have about 13-15 everyday players and just need a solid 9. Yes, there are questions and hopes involved, but I do not think it's unfounded hopes and expectations. More often than not a number one prospect does okay in year one, and Campbell hit better than Anthony in '24. The chances one from Anthony, Campbell and Mayer do well should be much better than 50-50. Counting on Story may be foolish, but we really just need his glove, not really his bat. Wong may not be young, anymore, but catchers often mature after 28, or even 30. Casas missed a lot of games, but seems to have proven he can hit. Abreu and Rafaela may end up on some sort of platoon rotation- maximizing both of their values. Devers may get hurt, again, but maybe not. Duran seems to keep getting better and better, but maybe he regresses. I'm not sure should count on regression from anyone but maybe Ref and Yoshida, due to their ages. IMO, it will be about the pitching. I do not see Hendriks, Fulmer, and Gio-Fitts-Priester as equal to Jansen, Martin & Pivetta. They all may help, but we need outside help with our staff- at least two quality pitchers..

Call me a rose-colored glasses wearing homer or worse, but it's hard for me not to get optimistic about our future Sox teams. The recent graduate list as as good as it's been in many years: '21 Houck & Whitlock '22 Duran, Bello, Crawford, Wong '23 Casas & Kelly '24 Slaten, Abreu, Rafaela & DHam '25 ML Ready: Anthony, Campbell, Fitts, Mayer, Teel, Guerrero, Penrod, Dobbins, Meidroth No doubt we still have major gaps and an owner with unknown intentions with the budget, but we have a solid base of young players that is only growing and improving. Add to this, the fact that Devers is younger than Duran and only Houck, Duran and Crawford are arb eligible, this winter- all just year one. Things are brighter: it's not just a perception. Yes, we lose Jansen, Pivetta, O'Neill and Martin, but we already can see we are adding many prospects, plus Hendriks, Gio, Fulmer as well as possible full seasons from many partial season 2024 players. It should not take major additions to turn us into a playoff team. It will take a couple or 3 to make us strong contenders, but that's closer than we have been in many years. We don't need to spread the winter budget across 5-7 players: 3 key players can be enough.

You certainly have more expertise than I do on this sort of thing (and others, too.) I'm not sure Jh Garcia will be selected or do well, if selected. If you are so sure, he won't, then maybe we shouldn't protect him, but teams do take chances on AA players, and IMO, I like Garcia's chances not just better but way better than the list of players I see as being #38, #39 and #40 on our roster, after we add a few players, like Dobbins, Fulmer and some FAs or trade additions. To me, this is what I look at. Of course, if Sox management thinks there is a zero chance he gets selected, then fine. Maybe even 1%: fine. IMO, it's more about my dislike for guys like Wikelman, Murphy, Horn, Shugart and others and my belief that we don't have s et lock on a number of 40 man guys that need to be pitchers. I also think Sogard and Gasper and maybe even EValdez are easily replace by waiver wire guys, if needed, midseason. Those are everyday guys. We do need to add a catcher, so there goes one slot. I get that. Maybe I'm too gah gah on Jh Garcia. I got that way on prospects that never amount to much, in the past. Maybe, this is another one of those times. At least you guys see him as a "maybe." Another point is that even if we want to start the year with non Rule 5 guys on the 26 and 40- like Anthony, Campbell or someone else, we can wait until opening day, by placing someone on the 60 Day IL to add them. They need not start the season on the 40, day one. That could keep a slot open for Garcia.

This would be astounding. I assume Campbell would be our 4th OF'er, not Ref, and he could play 2B, when not in the OF. I think we need something very bold, this winter, but I won't let myself expect one. I'm too tired of letdowns. The Story signing was a brief reprieve, and ultimately a letdown. The Yoshida signing was a pipedream. The Devers extension was treading water at an expensive price.

Come on, what? I mentioned the big tank before and that the increase did not come close to replacing those we lost before. The fact remains, the spending has not been on one steady downward trend, and the Devers & Story signings are two of the largest given our by JH. It still sucks. I'm pissed, too, but there is no evidence that cuts will continue onwards and onward. Recent evidence shows otherwise. Why does the truth hurt so much? Again, I'm not sugar coating anything. I'm pissed at the whole sham, but I keep hearing posters say JH will not sign anyone to a huge contract, when the largest deal in Sox history just began, this year. The Story signing was 2 years ago. Why do we have to ignore those signings to make our points? There is plenty of truthful things to say to make a JH-damning point. My whole point about bringing this up is to ask what evidence shows JH will keep cutting and cutting the budget, and again, I'm not denying it might happen, but what is the basis for this belief? JH has shown that he cuts, when he thinks the chances are low for a ring and splurges or spends more when he thinks we are approaching a window. He has cut right after a ring year and spent more after one, too. There is no way to predict. If anything, his trend is to keep going up and down. True, no cut was as massive as the one before 2020, and that set us so far back, that any increase is largely a mirage. I've even made the point that the rise in the budget from 2018 to 2019 was a mirage, as it only reflected rising costs of the same players we kept, while letting Kimbrel and Kelly go with no suitable replacements. I maintain the "cutting" really began in 2019, and that's what caused the rift between JH and DD. The downturn has been about 6 years long, with some superficial jumps in spending to try and placate fans and season ticket holders. I've called it a sham. "Come on," what? Nothing is as black and white as some want to think it is.

While it's true, not many AA players are selected Rule 5, Drohan did start off in AA in 2023. Thad Ward was drafted first in 2022. He started out in A-, went to A+ and spend teh rest of '22 in AA. He never played for Woo. I don't think it is worth the risk of losing Jh Garcia over some of the names I mentioned.

Exactly. None of us know. I, for one, am not counting on it. I'll believe it, if and when I see it. I will say JH has a long history of splurging, then going tight, rinse and repeat. His increase from 2020 to 2022 was one of his biggest in his 2 decades, in Boston. Yes, we can look at the time from 2018 to today as one long and deep cut, but it has not been steady. The Story and Yoshida signings may not match Price's deal, but Story's matches the Sale extension, pretty closely, and Yoshida comes close to the Bogey 3 year opt-out deal. The Devers extensions blows all other signings out of the water. I'm not sugar coating anything. I'm pissed, too. The Story and Yoshida signings did not nearly make up for the guys we lost. This has been one long cluster, but there is no evidence to say JH will not spend again. Hell, the Devers extension kicked in just this year, yet people act like he hasn't gone large and long since Price, Sale, Nate, Bogey and JD. I have no idea what he will do. I hope he spends big, soon, but I'm not holding my breath. I'll be surprised, if he does, this winter. I'll be mildly surprised if he does for 2026 or 2027. I won't be surprised, if he cuts, this year.

Change the subject- fine. I'm not down on Bogey. I wish we had kept him. I asked a question, "Would Sox Nation be happy with the last 2 years of Bogey had we signed him for $180M/6 or $220M/8?" I guess, I'll put you down as a firm YES. BTW, my views on Bogey have barely changed. I always wanted him on our team. I thought his defense was pretty bad, his offense was great and he was a clear net plus. At his age, I worried about decline and felt a change of position was needed. (I felt that when we signed Story, too.) I'll always have very fond memories of his offense.

In all fairness, when you look at the 40 man roster for 2020, that ended up missing Sale and ERod for the full season, you can see why building the 40 man roster depth (bottom up) over signing big ticket items, only to have no supporting cast. My issue has been that once we got the 40 man roster depth to an acceptable level (maybe by 2021 or 2022,) we went from building the bottom to building the middle with one and done players, sprinkled with a few 2 years guys like Kike, Sawamura, Diekman, and wait for it,,, the big splash Gio. (Actually Jansen & martin were good signings, but that came in 2023. Take a look at some of the names on the 2020 opening day roster, and tell me building the bottom should not have been the priority: Lucroy, Plawecki, Chavis, Arauz, Lin Weber, Hall, Covey, Brice, Osich, Brewer, P Valdez, Hembree, Walden & Brasier That's 15 from the 40. The mediocre guys were: Moreland, Pillar, Martin Perez, Springs, Workman and some thought Barnes, too. Basically the whole pen and all the rotation, except Nate were scubs or mediocre. By 2021, Perez went from our 2nd SP'er to our #5, although Richards pitched worse. Pivetta and Houck also were added. We added Ottavino, Whitlock and Schreiber to the pen. We went from 1 decent pitcher to 6 or 7, not counting Sale & ERod, who started 2021 on the IL. We did have Cordero and Dalbec in the starting 9, but had Arroto on the bench, who beat Arauz with a club. I count 6 scrubs and maybe 4-5 mediocres on this opening day 40- a big jump from 2020, and the results showed. Then, I think JH got too full of himself, and believed his own sham- thinking we can win without spending, and we've stayed pretty even since 2022. Even at mediocrity. I will say the 2022 season started out with a decent looking rotation, on paper: Nate, Houck, Pivetta, Wacha and Hill. The pen had Whitlock, Strahm and Barnes, but precious little more. The JBJ trade back-fired and Kike nosedived.

Maybe it's wishful thinking, on my part, and I'll say again that I do NOT expect big spending from JH, but it is possible that the kids start to shine brightly, and we look a piece or two away from a ring, and JH decides to splurge, once again. I doubt it is this winter, but just spending the same as last year is a pretty big chunk of AAV.

Key words, "all that much." Pablito did have post season success in 2012 and 2014, but he also had a .794 OPS with SFG, during the regular season, His 123 OPS+ was six better than Bogey's 117 w the Sox. All the warning signs were there, however: 130 OPS+ first 1869 PAs w SFG 116 OPS+ last 1664 w SFG (still near Bogey's career OPS+ w BOS)

I'm not sure player's stock goes up all that much over some post season success. He does fit the Sox profile for being a pitcher who has had great success but has missed so much time with injuries.

I don't doubt the budget goes down, again, but you seem so sure it will. At least you won't be let down. (I'm not expecting an increase, but I do think it may stay near the same, which would actually give Brez a pretty hefty winter spending budget.

Happy Halloween! Booooo Yankees!

CWS pay Moncada $5M option rather than $25M option. Twins decline Margot's $12M option and pay $2M buyout. ATL traded for another pitcher: Jorge Soler (owed $26M/2) for Griffin Canning (1 arb year left.) Gibson and Lynn's options declined.

I'm so sick of waiting for pitchers who had some kind of glory in the past to get healthy. Then the one we get rid of, wins the Cy Young.