Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    109,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    164

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I can't see us trading a valuable asset this winter. We are poised to be the favorites next year. Our biggest need is the pen, and you don't trade Bogey, Porcello or JBJ for a pen arm.
  2. I like the idea of the best hitter batting second. I'd like to see Bogey 3rd and JD 4th. Devers can bat 5th or the 1B platoon.
  3. I wouldn't count anything Kelly gives us going forward as part of the trade. Signing him is a separate acquisition.
  4. I haven't heard anything.
  5. Proves nothing. We aren't trading Porcello, JBJ or Bogey. We wouldn't have signed Eovaldi, if we were looking to rebuild. This is just attention getting.
  6. That's one reason I thought the deal would be doubtful.
  7. I doubt we have enough budget space for both. Both will likely get 3 or more years.
  8. Sounds like a trade is a certainty.
  9. I would not sign Cervelli to a 1 year $11.5M contract, so why should we trade anyone for him without some salary relief?
  10. There's no way this deal involves Syndergaard, unless some other major pieces are added.
  11. I would think there would have to be some salary relief as part of any deal. I'm not sure Pitt wants to pay cash, and I doubt this deal would work: Nunez ($5M), Swihart & PTBNL for Cervelli ($11.5M) Then, maybe add a 2Bman rule 5 or roll the dice with Pedey, Holt, Lin and Hernandez. (Nunez + Vaz would come close to evening out the money.)
  12. It's a 4 or 5 year window: 2016-2019 or 2020/
  13. Again, I'm not disagreeing with you on DD's impressive rebuild and long run at being competitive. I just felt like your claim that he made them a contender in 2 years was not true. It took 4 years. The team was then competitive for 7 of 9 years, which is a great and long stretch, before they hit a cliff.
  14. It's not happening, and you know it. Fans getting high on their team's prospects is nothing new. I'm sure DD is not counting on anything from those 4 in 2019.
  15. Certainly, they all show promise, and I'd love for one or two of them to rise quickly and win a significant role within a year or two, but none are nationally ranked. I realize many players make good who are never ranked, but I find it hard to get overly optimistic about any of our pitching prospects. The ones I like the most are in single A.
  16. If you never signed any pitcher because of one bad year out of the last 5, there might not be anybody left.
  17. Maybe, but maybe DD likes Chandler more, and we will sign someone soon.
  18. It was already cheapened, but now it's a comedy.
  19. That was amazing, but they went from 66 to 55 to 43 in his first 2 years. I'm not sure why that doesn't count. I see it as him taking 4 years to get to great. That's pretty good, too. I think he did an impressive job with the Tigers. The owner wanted him to get the team to win it all. He wanted a win now strategy, and DD got it for him. The Tigers were good for 7 of 9 years. That's better than the Sox last 9 years.
  20. I never said it wasn't impressive. Being competitive in 7 out of 9 years is impressive, but he did take 4 years not 2 to get the team on track. That's not bad, but you said 2 years. I have no issues with DD. He's been a very good GM and maybe even great.
  21. MLBTR projects an equal contract with Andrew Miller ($9M x 3 years).
  22. I agree. and though I have not given up on either one, I would not bet on them having a plus career going forward. I think Velazquez has the better chance, but I think his best role might be a 2-3 inning middle guy.
  23. ...and that second half was just 168 PAs. It would be nice to see him get a chance at 400 PAs, but I just don't see it happening here. Even if we have a major cathcer injury, I'd bet we trade for someone rather than let Swihart play FT.
×
×
  • Create New...