Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    107,256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    144

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I was just thinking that naming a one for one player might make more sense- maybe someone valued a little more than Mayer is - like... 66 Logan Gilbert (5 yrs of control) 64 Freddy Peralta (4) 61 Zac Gallen (3) 57 Max Fried (just 2 yrs) 57 Shane Bieber (just 2 yrs) 51 Christian Javier (3 yrs but worth less than Mayer on BTV) .
  2. Other than carry-overs from this year's Rule 5 list, here are some of the newbies that will be eligible in 2023's Rule 5 Draft: Jacinto Arredondo Rivaldo Avila Bradley Blalock Maceo Campbell Allan Castro Juan Chacon Casey Cobb Nathanael Cruz Kelvin Diaz Jordan DiValerio Shane Drohan Juan Daniel Encarnacion Jose Garcia Jhon Garcia Jhostynxon Garcia Alexis Hernandez Graham Hoffman Lyonell James Robert Kwiatkowski Chih-Jung Liu Blake Loubier Matthew Lugo Yorberto Mejicano Jose Mendez Henry Núñez Luis Perales Railin Perez Ronald Rosario Cesar Ruiz Johnfrank Salazar Reidis Sena Karson Simas Cesar Soto Joey Stock Nate Tellier Brian Van Belle Diego Viloria Jeremy Wu-Yelland
  3. I think, by opening day, we will have a roster where most baseball prognosticators pick us as a probable wild card team. How we get there is the 90 million dollar question.
  4. Even after the Beni trade, I thought we'd see Renfroe in LF and Dugo in RF. I was one of the few that wanted Kike in CF, not 2B, from day one.
  5. I don't think Alcantara is a good name to bring up. We'd trade Mayer and Rafaela for him in a heartbeat and the Marlins would be criticized for accepting just those two.
  6. I've been saying for a long time, our best chance at greatly improving our rotation is by trade. I still feel that way. It's not just about our history with Pedro, Schill, Beckett and Sale: it's about not spending so much on the next Price or Lackey.
  7. I totally agree, but it is a dice roll. In no way am I comparing Duran and Downs to Mayer and Bleis, but we could/should have traded them before that "one more year."
  8. I'm not saying this is the best class I've ever seen. I don't believe it is. The Betts, Bogey, Devers, Vaz & JBJ one jumps to mind. A few from the Theo years, too. My point was more about the quantity with some decent quality attached. I named over 20 players that could have a positive contribution in 2023. Yes, more likely 8-12 might, and some could suck, so badly, they wipe out the plusses by the others. I get that.\ Maybe it's just the complete disaster our farm has been between the Devers and Bello promotions that has me wide-eyed. I like the class coming up, right now. I think we have 3-4 solid prospects and enough sleeper prospects to put the odds of 2-3 of the secondary tier doing something special at more than 50-50. I'm thinking 7-8 will leave us feeling real good ab out by season's end. Since we have about 6-8 high need areas, and should fill some by additions, I'm optimistic about 2023, even if we don't go "all in." (Not optimistic on being a top 4-5 contender, but odds on faves to make the playoffs with just some decent additions.)
  9. Good points. Other than getting a solid SP'er via trade, I think this might be the best we can expect to happen: 1 from Nate or Senga 1 from Kluber, Heaney, Lugo, and maybe Wacha or Strahm as a starter. To me, this essentially make 2023 a punt season. Nothing else we could do would make me think we're a top contender, even if we sign Correa, Nimmo and a couple solid pen arms, which ain't happening.
  10. Most of that was from atrocious defense and being forced to play 1B, when it was obvious he was a butcher, there. His meager + O bWAR in 2022 (+0.4) keeps hope alive he could stick, somewhere, as a DH, but certainly he did not fulfill the hopes he had at the time of the trade. Nobody can say we won that trade, unless you can claim we signed Renfroe with the money saved, but that is a stretch and dubious reasoning. The solace is that we can look back and say that no way Beni would have led us to greater things, beyond maybe a few more wins in lost seasons. The 2021 team was better with Renfroe not Beni.
  11. I still have some hope- more than I do for Downs & Duran (and Seabold).
  12. The Sox rarely have a pick as high as the Mayer one, and many industry people felt he was the best of a pretty strong draft class. It would seem rash to then trade him away before he even reached AA. I doubt we trade a possible once-in-a-lifetime prospects like Mayer, but it may come down to how much we like Romero and our choice to sign or not sign a SS, longterm, this winter.
  13. Five to seven years ago, our top prospects were mostly traded away and never got a chance to step foot on a ML field in a Sox uniform. That farm was ranked highly- higher than this one, but I don't think we ever reached a point where 20+ prospects or very recent grads were all ML ready at the same time. I agree, many on this list project as bench or pen players, but we do have quite a few very promising young players: Bello Casas Rafaela Mata Kelly, German, Walter, Wong and EValdez to a lesser extent
  14. I'm a big fan of building the farm up and keeping it strong, but I'd trade Mayer for Lopez and Berti or Rogers and Berti, right now, especially if it meant we were going to sign Bogey or Correa, long term.
  15. I'm more hopeful about Devers staying than I was for Betts and am now for Bogey, but losing all three would rival the loss of Fisk, Lynn and Burleson- not to mention Lee, Cooper & Tiant. I'm not so sure Bloom will be so reluctant to trade a top prospect or two. I felt the same about Ben, but we never found out about him doing that. Bloom has been in systems that have farm building as a top priority his whole career, including the first 3 years with the Sox. I'm not sure that priority is still number one, right now, but I think it might still be #1 or #2 on the top brass list. I think, if the right deal comes along, Bloom might be told or made to pull the trigger, of he may not have to be talked into it, at all. It's hard to know. I, for one, am glad we have chose to strengthen and deepen the farm. I think it is the plan most likely to keep us winning more consistently than we have seen. We can see, first hand, what happens to a team that has a farm that produces only Houck over a 5 year period. We can't win by keeping that up. Will many or most of these promising prospects produce as we hope? Nobody knows, for sure, but I'm excited by the sheer number of promising or semi-promising ML ready or recent grads on our 40 man roster or just a year or two away. I'm also excited about our further-away prospects. We are likely to see all or almost all of these guys get a look, this season: Bello Casas Kelly German Crawford Winckowski Seabold Mata Walter TWard (if not selected by rule 5) Murphy, Ort, Politi, Wallace, Fernandez Wong Rafaela E Valdez W Abreu R Hernandez, Downs, Duran, Koss, D Hamilton When is the last time the list has been this large and long? It's not hard to imagine close to 26 players getting a chance to play on the 26 man roster, this year, and not because the team is sucking and in total rebuild mode, but because they deserve a shot or injuries have become an issue.
  16. I read somewhere that Rogers is the guy the Marlins prefer to trade- not Lopez, but I'm sure the right offer might get any one of their SP'ers. Must be nice to have 6-7 solid SP'ers and the ability to trade one (or lose one to free agency like the Astros likely will with Verlander.) I think the Marlins seem like the best fit for a big trade, but maybe 12-15 teams are thinking the same thing. If we could somehow pry Berti from them, too, I'd be thrilled, but maybe we'll end up taking on Garcia or Soler to lessen the return package needed. Here are BTV's numbers: Marlins: 140 Alcantara 69 Perez (Prospect) 39 Lopez 37 Rogers 27 Luzardo 23 Garrett 10 Cabrera (Other natabales: 7.5 Berti, -33 Garcia, -21 Soler, 0 Stallings) Brewers: 78 Burnes 64 Peralta 38 Woodruff 34 Williams 33 Ashby 6 Houser (-126 Yelich) Astros (won't be trading a SP'er, except maybe Urquidy)) 69 Valdez 51 Javier 46 Garcia 28 Brown 4 Urquidy -29 McCullers
  17. I don't think a single fan or poster would be okay with adding just Kluber to our sketchy rotation, even if we beefed up the pen and spent to fill the SS and RF holes adequately. No doubt, we cannot count on Sale and Paxton. Maybe counting on the two combined to start 33 games would be more dream than reality. Maybe planning on 33 from the two is not a terrible idea, but maybe they both start 16 in the same time period and leave two holes for the other half of the season. We need to plan accordingly, and if we want to strongly compete in 2023, not with other 5 slot pitchers like Heaney or Lugo. Even if 2024 is deemed "the year" we start to become meaningful top contenders, we can still start building up a solid rotation in 2023. The fans would appreciate it, and maybe show their appreciation by buying more tickets and NESN subscriptions. I don't see us signing a QO SP'er, so I think a trade, at some point, will need to be made. I see two likely choices: 1. Put our hopes on Mayer, go cheap and short at SS, and beef up the rotation and OF. Trade Rafaela and others not named Mayer, Bleis and Bello for a SP'er. 2. Put our hopes in Rafaela, Abreu of some prospect moving to the OF and go large and long at SS (Correa & Bogey both have no QO.) Trade Mayer for a SP.
  18. Agreed. I hope T Ward is not selected. Maybe there are better options elsewhere. Wikelman might be the best of the 4 that may be selected, but he probably would not pitch for the big club that selects him.
  19. That's the best way I see us building a solid winning team: spend on a SS and the pen. Maybe skimp/bridge on RF in hopes Rafaela or Abreu can shine, soon enough. Trade for an ace, like we always have.
  20. My hopes on Wink are pretty low. The trade was nothing much to complain about, IMO. One could argue we used the money saved by trading Beni to sign Renfroe. One could then argue, we got JBJ back because of Renfroe. (Or, one could argue the money saved was spent on Marwin.) Trades like this could be twisted and turned into whatever we want it to be, I guess.
  21. Had we gone 11-7 and not 7-11 in extra inning games, we'd have finished over .500 at 82-80.
  22. He's a graduate from the Ole Red School of Vagaries.
  23. So, Beni for Beni + prospects. LOL
  24. ...and three other prospects: de la Rosa, Valdez & Gambrell Also, Beni's team control is over, so his side of the trade is completed.
  25. Some of the cheap teams will never ask about a few higher priced players. Some higher spending teams may not inquire about a few good players that just don’t fit their roster.
×
×
  • Create New...