-
Posts
103,126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
127
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by moonslav59
-
Third Baseman Ketel Marte Is On the Boston Red Sox's Radar
moonslav59 replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I agree, but I often wonder how much Brez misguesses what some of the FAs will end up getting. "Showing interest" and underbidding by 1-2 years and or $5+M a year is sort of like wasting time and energy. I get the idea that you have to "kick the tires," but sometimes our reported offers look absurd. -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
moonslav59 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I think we are done adding pitchers. I think we subtract by one or two. (Maybe we subtract 3-4 and add one.) I'm certain we add a batter, but he might be underwhelming. (Perhaps Yandy Diaz, Wiillson Contreras, Sean Murphy at 1B or Vientos or Paredes (1B/3B) or Donovan (2B.) I'm losing hope we get Bregman, Suarez or KMarte. Maybe 40% we get one of these 3. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Selected Players' fWAR (MLB rank) + OPS since 2021: 20.3 Devers (21st) .868 (1st on this listy) 20.0 Bogey (25th) .784 (10th on list) 19.6 Bregman (29th) .799 (7th on this list) 19.4 K Marte (31st) .857 (3rd on this list) 17.7 Bichette (37th) .795 (8th) 17.4 Realmuto (39th) ,771 16.3 S Murphy (43rd) .767 15.8 Alonso (44th) .842 (4th) 15.4 Suarez .767 & Y Diaz .822 (5th) (T45th in fWAR) 14.4 Wi Contreras (59th) .809 (6th) 13.0 T Hernandez (65th) 14.1 Schwarber (61st) .867 (2nd) 12.8 Duran (67th) .780 12.4 Paredes (70th) .777 11.9 B Lowe (76th) .792 (9th) 11.2 H-S Kim (82nd) 10.1 Donovan (91st) 8.7 Story (105th) Last 3 years top OPS (1000+ PAs) .892 Tucker .887 K Marte ,886 Schwarber .857 Devers .843 Y Diaz .827 Alonso .817 Wi Contreras .810 Duran .796 Bregman .780 B Lowe .778 Bichette .775 Suarez .774 Teoscar ,771 Donovan .762 Yoshida .753 Polanco .746 S Murphy .738 Viento (and Bogey) .736 Realmuto -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Over Uberstine & Drohan???? -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
moonslav59 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
"Sorry franchises" don't win 4 rings in 2 decades. BTW, we went over the tax line in 2015. Only 7 teams did, and they are called big spenders or sometimes "BIG MARKET." High quality gets? Crochet was gotten before extended. Chapman- only the best RP'er in MLB in 2025 and maybe the best RP season since Koji. Gray Close or promising high quality: Giolito Slaten Narvaez Tolle O'Neill (for scraps) -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
moonslav59 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Exactly and no reason to say you're sorry. We've been bitching about losing Betts for over 5 years. The bitching about Bogey bolting has all but gone away, and much of the complaining has been about not replacing these loses in kind. Had we extended those guys way back when, maybe we'd have avoided some of these major setbacks. (We did extend Bogey.) Now, we are doing things differently, and yes, some of these extensions may not work out all that well, but I for one applaud the efforts and seed change. I for one am not trying to defend or prop up this management group. They don't deserve it, but I'm also not going to deny that some serious changes have taken place. I listed 10 and also spoke about the major shift towards obtaining and developing pitching prospects, and that may yield the best results over any of the 10 events I named. It's been rather astounding how quickly Brez, with some help from Bloom, reshaped our ML pitching staff and depth as well as the farm pitching depth from the rookie leagues to AAA. Brez has traded away some promising pitchers and of course Sale, but in the overall scheme of things, he's done a tremendous job building quality depth. Some moves have already proven worthless, many are TBD and some have already netted plus results. (Not counting FA signings) Crochet for a lot of prospects Gray and Oviedo for players/prospects Slaten was a Rule 5 trade Weissert and Fitts for Dugo Harrison is not worth Devers, but he does have promise. Moran for Gasper Prospects by rank: 1. Tolle -draft 4. Witherspoon- draft 6. Bennett for Perales did not add to pitching, but he is promising, 8. Fajardo- for Booser 10. Sandlin- for Schreiber 11. Phillips & 12. Eyanson- draft 16. Drohan- reacquired from Rule 5 loss 17. Holobetz- for Priester 22. Watson- for Reimer 24. Delzine- IFA 30. Samaniego- Rule 5 trade That's 20 pitchers, so far, not counting FAs and then add these 11 more.... 36 Aita, 37 Tygart, 46 Foutch, 52 Neeley, 53 Morgan, 58 Patton & Finley: all by draft. 42. E Rivera & 58. Cooper Adams by MiLBFA 50. I Jackson- for Grissom 55. Jose Bello- for Devers Pretty amazing. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Deals like Fulmer are fine with me, and he was not a major add. He was signed as depth. Sandoval does not have a guaranteed rotation slot- far from it. We only have 3- Crochet, Gray and Bello. Oviedo might be ahead of Sandoval on the current depth chart based on expectations, but all of our rotation depth after Bello have to earn their slots. As of today, I might order them like this, but none are locked into any slot: 4/5 Oviedo & Sandoval 5/6 Crawford & Harrison 6/7/8/9/10 Dobbins, Tolle, Early 11+ Uberstine, Drohan, Sandlin and maybe Bennett or Mullins with Holobetz as a longshot. I'd much prefer a bit more quality over quantity, but we had 11+ guys last winter and ended up with Newcomb in the opening season rotation and had to trade for DMay and start 2 rookies not in that initial top 11 depth chart in March 2025. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Yes, the deals like Paxton, Hendriks and Sandoval all promised some help in late season 1, but it never happened, and then year 2 was no walk in the park. The Gio signing was different. He was healthy and had a durable history. The year 1 was an unexpected event, but nevertheless, it happened. The other longer deals had opt-outs. It was good to see Chapman extended and given another option year, but they guy is turning 80 soon. We did lock up Crochet, but when the next longterm FA signing happens is in doubt. Yoshida and Story are the only two in over 6 years, and neither was really top dollar. -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
moonslav59 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
The sliver of hope, to me was last winter- most notably the Crochet trade, extension and the Bregman signing. Yes, there as the opt outs. There was also the Buehler signing, which sucked, but the money spent was about double the previous winter SP'er signings, except for Gio, who was still on the books when we inked that deal. There was a significant uptick in spending and some changes to the team philosophy on spending, starting with the massive Devers extension- both in years and dollars. That was #1. 2. Bello extended. 3. Rafaela extended. 4. Giolito signed for 2 years NOT 1 (with 3rd year insurance, if he got hurt year 2.) 5. The Crochet trade was the biggest since Sale. 6. The Crochet extension. The largest and longest pitcher deal since Price. 7. The Bregman contract shattered our FA AAV record. 8. The Campbell extension. 9. The Anthony extension. 10. That Chapman signing (then extension.) We did not have 10 moves like this in over 5 years combined (from Nata/Sale deals to the Devers deal.) There is no denying a shift took place. We can talk about why they did it, and if it will continue, but we cannot deny it happened. Some worries happened after these 10 events: 1. We dumped Devers and took on the Hicks deal, while adding little production. 2. Bregman opted out. 3. Giolito opted out. So far, we replaced the Buehler deal with Gray, but we gave up a couple decent prospects to do that. That looks like a plus, but maybe it's offset by replacing Gio with Oviedo, who also cost a couple players to get him. I have serious doubts about 2026 and beyond. I have zero expectations, thanks to these management groups continuing lies and deceptions- or shams, as I like to call it. I'll believe it when I see it. As bad as things got after the Betts trade, the one good thing management did was to build (too slowly) up the 40 man roster depth and farm from top to bottom. The recent shift towards building up the farm pitching has been eye-opening. I can't help but ask, "for what reason?" At this point, we should be looking to fill the 2-3 major gaps we have on the 26 man roster: 3B or 2B (wherever Mayer/Romy do not play) 1B (No, we cannot count on Casas for 2026) SP2 (No, Gray should be our #3 not #2.) If we just fill 2 of these slots with real talent, we can get by without the third, but the problem is, I have serious doubts we even fill one of the three slots with a true impact player. We sit and we wait- just like every offseason since pre 2018. -
Third Baseman Ketel Marte Is On the Boston Red Sox's Radar
moonslav59 replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Before I looked, I expected massive sample size differences and the percent of success to be closer than it was. The drop off, at least in 2025 was profound at 300 PAs. How about 150 PAs cutoff? Only 28 players 34-37 made the cut. 8 at 2.1+ 7 from 1.1 to 2.0 (15 at 1.1+) 54% 22 are above 0 2 at 0 4 in negative (14%) _________________ 30-33 (99 player sample size is over 3 x more than 34-37 yr olds) 41 at 2.1 or more 15 at 1.1 to 2.0 (56/99 are at 1.1 or more) 59% does not blow 34-37 away, but there are some whoppingly big fWARs in this group) 81 are plus 1 at 0 17 are negative (17% shows more also suck, as a percentage) __________________ 26-29 has a 146 players w 150+ PAs (50% more than 30-33 and over 5 X the oldest group!) 43 are at 2.1 or more 33 from 1.1 to 2.0 (76/146 at 1.1 or more) 52%, which is lower than both older groups, 114 at 0.1 or more 5 at 0 27 are negative (18% is worse than the older groups) ____________________________ I'm not sure what this all means. There were less older players than I thought. The ones that stick around suck less than younger players, but they don't reach the highs either. As a percent in each group by fWAR, there are not massive differentials by numbers, but if you add up all the WAR values and divided by how many in the group, I think we'd see stark differences. I was surprised the 30-33 look better than 26-29. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I doubt we only sign 1 year guys, this winter. We signed Gio and Hendriks to super long 2 year deals (LOL) before 2024, and signed Sandoval, last winter. Now, when we need top talent, we will back off on 2 year deals? How about a one year with team option with a buyout? -
Red Sox 2025 Season Review/Offseason Preview Thread
moonslav59 replied to Brandon Glick's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I see that point, but I also see how our pitching depth is a goldmine for trading purposes, especially to teams that can't afford to pay for FA pitching but think they are a decent SP'er or two away from having a shot. While I'd really like a solid #2 to push Gray to 3 and Bello to 4, our top need is a big bat. (I'd say two, but I keep getting shouted down.) Let AZ pay Bregman. We can trade an OF'er & a few pitchers (not named Tolle or Early) for Marte. Then, sign Suarez or Okamoto, or take a flyer on FA pitcher like Imai or be bold and get Ranger Suarez. Okay- okay, I'm dreaming, again. Pinch me. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
If those rankings are correct, the need for offense is legit. -
Third Baseman Ketel Marte Is On the Boston Red Sox's Radar
moonslav59 replied to Matthew Lenz's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Good points. I'm not sure why the 2.3 cut-off, but I'll roll with it. I used fangraphs 2025 and 300+ PAs. 4 out of the 20 player sample size had an fWAR of 2.3 or more. 30-33 year olds: 39 out of 77 26-29: 39/101 22-25: 31/73 All way higher numbers and percentages. I'll do a deeper dive, later. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Kind of a quiet winter, so far. Plenty of moves- just not many big ones... Sonny Gray & $10M for Fitts & Clarke Johan Oviedo, Tyler Samaniego & Adonys Guzman for J Garcia & Travieso Ryan Watson (Rule5) for Riemer & lost J Paez to Rule 5 selection Jake Bennett for Perales Tristan Gray for Guerrero Ronny Hernandez for Murphy Isaiah Jackson for Grissom Braiden Ward for Bernardino Luke Heyman for Hoppe -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I'm not trying to get one that they actually do, so keep on trying to figure out other posters' motivations. I did get the Cody Ross signing right way back in the day! LOL! -
Assuming these SP'ers will get some starts at the MLB level, we are still loaded up in the minors: Crochet, Gray, Bello Crawford, Oviedo, Sandoval Harrison, Dobbins, Tolle, Early _______________________ Uberstine, Drohan, Sandlin, Mullins, Bennett Holobetz, Rogers, Wehunt, Rivera, Dean Valera, Fajardo, Witherspoon, Phillips, Eyanson, Aita Tygart, Neely, Ehrlicher, J Bello, M Patton, L Finley D Brown, B Margan, Y Ruiz, M Bido, Y Chirino & more
-
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
He did get to "dump" Contreras in my scenario. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
He would not pass through waivers. Maybe HOU has no want for DHam and might take Sogard, instead or nobody else. It's just conjecture. BTW, 2024-2025 3.6 bWAR 1.8 fWAR (31st among 2Bmen with 500+ PAs) Not bad for a sub. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
MLB.com projects the Sox rotation as 2nd best in MLB and the pen 5th best. https://www.mlb.com/news/red-sox-position-breakdown-as-of-december-2025 If the season started today, they have Ceddanne at 2B, Mayer at 3B and the rest as expected. C: 23rd ranked 1B: 17th 2B: T 14th SS: 27th 3B: 23rd (Pretty sad infield) LF: T6th CF: 8th RF: 7th (Pretty nice OF) DH 12th -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Not sure why he fascinates you so much, but HOU is giving us two IF'ers for 1 and it's a 2 for 2 forty man roster swap. -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
How about K Campbell & DHam to HOU for Paredes & Brice Mathews? -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
B Lowe & Mangum to PIT Mike Borrows to HOU Jacob Melton & A Brito to TBR -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
To BOS: Paredes 12 To HOU: Rafaela 36, Hicks -18 ______________________ To BOS: Hunter Greene 82 To CIN: Mayer 55, Campbell 19 & Harrison 7 ____________________ To BOS: Contreras -14 To STL: Yoshida -26 & Casas 18 -
A Realistic Look at the 2026 Red Sox: Part I
moonslav59 replied to moonslav59's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
To BOS: Lodolo 31, Donovan 33 & Contreras -18 To CIN: Rafaela 36 To StL: Crawford 22, Casas 18, Masa -18

