Yea, I have to agree with this. That was some pretty harsh slander we just can't verify, especially the part on Hanley's motivation. Yes, we probably know Hanley isn't going to get a gold star on work ethic on the things he doesn't want to do, but I don't think we can come to the kind of conclusions Jung wrote by what the info we are provided.
I particularly like the part about monitoring Hanley's mental stability game to game.
But the point made about Farrell announcing Young subbing for JBJ is right on IMO. It shouldn't have been said.