Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

sk7326

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sk7326

  1. The team just got worn down as the season went on and only Porcello could reliably give innings. The postseason - with the starters all effectively pitching in, things have gotten better. Kelly in particular has been a revelation. (he's probably the best candidate for WS MVP with Eovaldi) If he can command his secondary stuff like that, he really can be dominant.
  2. That was just a great game last night - the comeback, the raw emotion. Baseball should market the crap out of Puig's reaction and ERod's reaction to that homerun. Game 3 was a heartbreaking, morbidly fascinating battle of wills, but Game 4 was just a magnificent baseball game.
  3. He's 32 coming off of a terrible season - how big is his market really?
  4. WE know Cora will go for the throat here if possible - I fully expect Eovaldi or Sale to be available for the right situation ... flags fly forever, and the guys have just been great about stepping out of their comfort zones for this
  5. He's shored up the position defensively. Offensively he has been terrible - but the Sox have had way to work around that. It was a good move. I could see Boston looking at another stopgap for next year (like Brian Dozier maybe) since you have to go in assuming Pedroia is not coming back.
  6. White Sox were effin monsters that year - and given me a fun way to needle Cubs fans in 2016 who whined about how long it's been since Chicago has had a winner.
  7. The game going 750 innings cost Eovaldi a start ... and yet, he might very well be ready to go tonight. Really, one of the best testaments to Cora's communication ability is how the guys have continually openly volunteered to step a little bit out of their routines and comfort zones to help the team. Price and Eovaldi have been particularly noteworthy, but I have no doubt Porcello and Sale will be ready to take the call tonight.
  8. given Puig's splits - it was a calculated risk, but a reasonable one. Rodriguez was terrific - and could very well have escaped trouble if Vasquez just took the forceout and ate the ball. While I could see getting Barnes in to face Puig, it was not an obvious decision.
  9. Wow, did that Game 3 18-inning odyssey change the momentum of the series or what??!!!
  10. The announcing is fine. I like Buck - and he is so much better at this than football (probably because he likes baseball more). His calls in three of the seminal baseball games of all time (the 2004 ALCS Games 4 and 5, the 2011 World Series Game 6) were great. Often he has been saddled with terrible partners. Smoltz is the best of the partners he has had, even if his expertise is narrow.
  11. i think that is possible too - clearly it's one of those two. Amazingly - because of Eovaldi's brilliance, the bullpen should be more or less okay to go tonight. If Rodriguez and/or Pomeranz can get them through 4 innings in good shape we'll be fine.
  12. The Vasquez bunt was fine ... it was a great play. I mean they needed to push a run across and getting to 2nd and 3rd with one out was a good idea. Now Cora made some mistakes to have the team left - Eovaldi pitching a billion innings was not idea, but the time you get to the 16th or something a pitcher was going to have to do this. I think they held Pomeranz back knowing they needed a starter today. Today is clearly a bullpen game - if Pomeranz can get through the lineup once that will be a victory.
  13. Kinsler lost the game for us - but it's nothing that can't be fixed. Remember: 1. The Reds won Game 7 on the road after LOSING the Fisk game 2. The Red Sox STILL had a 3-0 lead halfway through Game 7 after LOSING the Buckner game 3. The Astros won the 2017 world series on the road after LOSING Game 6 4. The Dodgers won the 2018 NLCS on the road after LOSING Game 6 5. The Giants won the 2014 World Series on the road after LOSING Game 6 6. The Cardinals won the 1967 World Series in Boston after LOSING Game 6 Yeah, you have your rout after the Denkinger game (1985), or the Freese game (2011). But even more often, you just have another game to win. This was a heartbreaking game which cost me a lot of sleep. But it was one game in a series we're still leading. If we lose 3 more games it's because the Dodgers outscored us in each of the games - nothing else.
  14. This was not Cora's finest game tactically. His aggression was laudable, but I was surprised they did not directly double switch Leon in when Rodriguez game in ... and allowed them to not use Swihart as the first guy off the bench. It seemed like they could have put off running out of hitters a bit. It was a miracle with such a desperately thin lineup they still extended the game to the 18th.
  15. whether he was tipping his pitches or not, the balance looks so much better ... he just had not idea where his pitches were going
  16. just as I was finished typing "pinch hit for Devers - yuck" ... woo hoo!
  17. If he is throwing the changeup like that, sure.
  18. I understand why Cora didn't do it - but I would have considered pinch hitting Holt there. There was a chance to break the game open.
  19. They resemble one of our mid-2000s teams. Take a ton of pitches, playing for the 3-run homer.
  20. Per Sean McAdam - Devers is 1 RBI behind Andruw Jones for most postseason RBIs for age 22 and younger ... so he has 83 minutes to get this done!
  21. Devers has been their best hitter this postseason - go figure
  22. JD will want that one back
  23. For me the big key to the series is can the Red Sox pitchers find the plate? The 30 walks/hit batters in 5 games is not great against a real take-and-rake lineup like LA.
  24. When you consider that the average pace in the 60s was 25% higher than league pace today. Put it this way. In 1962, the average NBA team went 46 for 108 in each game. In 1996 it was 37 for 80. There were about 20 more available misses. Russell was amazing - but relative to the league Rodman's best rebounding seasons were more nuts.
  25. Obviously. At the same time that was an era where pace of play was extremely fast and shooting leaguewide was awful. (Bob Cousy never shot 40% from the floor) Rebounds were also very plentiful back then. You can argue that some of Rodman's best rebounding seasons were every bit as good or better.
×
×
  • Create New...