Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

sk7326

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sk7326

  1. Keuchel's floor is Rick Porcello - meh numbers with outstanding bulk and durability.
  2. Who's moving to 1B? ... Donaldson. This ain't Beltre who was still a great 3B who needed to restore some counting stats so he could make money. It's an injured guy who is past his prime but can stiill hit. Britton, if healthy is an obvious "sure why not" choice. He is such an absurd ground ball pitcher that his floor is extremely high. If it wasn't for the Lisfranc, Herrera would be the best reliever on the market.
  3. Something like that - where one of the league's better bats can restore his value. He also would fill a useful spot for us (1B/3B).
  4. There are enough interesting options that Dombrowski will add. The Sox will be in the market for a starter too - though what that means I don't know. And I do think it is worthwhile to see if there is a 2010 Beltre-esque sort of deal that Josh Donaldson would agree to.
  5. In the short term the Red Sox biggest asset is money - they ability to dole it out and the ability to absorb it via trade.
  6. I think so - Zach Britton looks really interesting if he's healthy. He had a 78% groundball rate in his Yankees tour. If he was healthy Herrera would have been the best reliever in this crop, so certainly worth checking him out.
  7. Right. The question is what end of the pool will they be fishing in. Dallas Kuechel and Patrick Corbin are the best starters otherwise. The Red Sox rotation is already more lefthanded than they'd prefer. I guess if Eovaldi goes, would you be okay with Morton or Ryu for 2-3 years.
  8. Is? Almost any black and white picture of a minor league outfield wall gave that up.
  9. Of course they are ... narrative is still rewarded in the MVP. (Why Yelich got the NL MVP in a year where there were better candidates among starting pitchers) The Cy is the easiest of the four big awards to evaluate. Who is the league's best pitcher? It's pretty simple - and even then it's not perfect. (see any year with a closer winning it) As Dan Symborzki noted, the manager of the year - the least stat-y of the awards - has been decided in the most stat-y way of the awards. (the largest jump in wins) Rookie of the year and MVP are sort of in the same vein - narrative factors come into voting if the quantitative case isn't sufficient. As I've noted - future stardom is absolutely something I'd consider when the candidates are pretty close together in terms of production. Part of the goal of something like rookie of the year is to point out to casual fans the stars of tomorrow (not the primary goal, but certainly a consideration). No need to run from that.
  10. Yes - although really this was the best offseason to do it (Bogaerts). The team realizes they have a special opportunity. Henry has the luxury of letting the team's performance dictate this ultimately.
  11. it still does - i mean you can see it in the "position adjustment". They aren't as stark now - but it matters.
  12. I think the old rules still matter quite a bit. Offense on the corners, defense up the middle. Defense on the corners is awesome, but priorities are clear.
  13. i have no real issue with a double fisted 1B situation ... the only real improvement on the market is Goldschmidt and we don't have the stuff to do that
  14. It's a big bet on digital rights. Obviously live television is the one thing holding the "cord" together. Also for FOX it is particularly important ... FS1 needs content. Apparently talks are also occuring with the other TV partners. ESPN I'm sure wants to get more LDS rights. TBS in general is not very good imo although Brian Anderson is probably the best of the national PBP guys.
  15. it definitely looks like 1B defense has been valued more than ever ... there seem to be fewer "glorified DHs" (this is true about LFs as well)
  16. I have a hunch he will be the Red Sox manager as long as Dombrowski is at the top of the org chart. Heck I wouldn't be surprised if he got bored after 3-4 seasons and wanted to get into the front office.
  17. I am not part of this "we"
  18. We'll see what happens. The national level booths are filled with calcified "old man yells at cloud" types - and so turning it over is not a bad thing. And for a game which has been so enhanced by Latino presence - to have a less whitebread announcing situation is worth exploring.
  19. I agree with you in isolation, but if you look at the position around the AL this year, there was not much at 1B. Moreland/whomever was about as productive as most of them. I think it is fair to say that while Moreland is not a great all around 1B, the Red Sox used him to staff the position very effectively at a cost-effective clip.
  20. He had an okay 2010. In 2011 he was awful - but was a perfectly fine pitcher after his TJS. I have a hunch why he might have been awful in 2011.
  21. Johnson will be important - the way he was important this year. You need guys like him to get through the 162 game marathon. I wouldn't pay a ton for him - the ceiling is modest - but I respect what he brings to the party.
  22. 1. These are regular season awards. 2. David Price went 10-2 in his starts as a hired gun for Toronto 3 seasons ago. They don't make it to the postseason without him. Was he the AL MVP?
  23. I don't think there is a real wrong answer in Ortiz v Edgar. But the Hall should take full time DH's more seriously - and they are clearly the two which should get first consideration. Now with Paul Molitor in and Jim Thome playing more or less the entire 2nd half of his career as a DH - the voters really should let them in.
  24. Pitcher wins means exactly zero to me. Snell provided 0.6 bWAR more than Sale over 30+ more innings, while providing almost 30 innings of bulk less than Verlander. Snell was a perfectly good choice. My point holds amply. Sale was a lock for the award until August - but he just did not deliver enough quantity. While I admire what he did when he DID pitch - that is 30-50 innings of above replacement baseball which the Red Sox had to identify contingencies for. Sale finishing 3rd was fine with me.
  25. You don't have to wonder - Papi never had an OPS+ above 120 during those years (obviously early in his career). Edgar's first batting title was in 1992 - and like Ortiz he had a brief stretch where he wasn't actually very good. But Edgar had a higher career OPS+. Edgar led the league in OPS+ once, Ortiz never did. And of course there is the on-base %. Ortiz will get in the Hall first, and it's not a robbery - but Martinez clearly deserves to be in and was every bit as good.
×
×
  • Create New...