Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

FredLynn

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by FredLynn

  1. Would you rather have the #1 pick or the #30 pick? The 5 or the 25? I take the higher pick in an every circumstance. You would too.
  2. I kinda don’t want to go through the list right now. Other than to give him a B+ for dumping Devers. He’s an incredibly self centered player who I wouldn’t want on my team at all. Not sure if you have been following how self centered he has been in SF lately. He refused to come out of a game recently when the manager came to remove him for a pinch runner, waving the manager away. But since you agree with me about the draft position being meaningful then why not plan for the best possible future by losing as many of these meaningless games as possible? I always want what’s best for the team and this year it means losing.
  3. The bottom large font bold print is a statement of fact without presenting the data. Its a summary of the data. Its also common sense that, in general, higher draft picks will tend to do better as pros. Otherwise why even have a draft order? Why not just let all the teams pick a number out of a hat?
  4. I think that Breslow is history and that I am hopeful ownership chooses a new GM that can make better choices. Breslow has made a few good decisions, but too few IMO.
  5. I gave you the facts. You didn't like them. Too bad. For the purposes of review since your memory seems to be short: To determine if higher baseball draft picks tend to be better, consider the following points: Historical data shows that higher draft picks often have better career statistics. Top picks usually come from elite college programs or high school talent, indicating higher skill levels. Teams invest significant resources in scouting and analysis, favoring top prospects. Many successful MLB players were high draft picks, but not all top picks succeed. Injuries and development paths can impact a player's career, regardless of draft position. Overall, while higher picks tend to have better outcomes, exceptions exist.
  6. Not a bit. Not only do you have to draft high but you also must make good choices as to who you draft. The FLOPS have sucked at that.
  7. It’s not my intent to do anyone any favors. Just pointing out the facts to those who are open to digesting them.
  8. Its an odds thing, not a guarantee. This (below) is from an AI search when I asked the question "do higher draft picks tend to perform better than lower draft picks": "To determine if higher baseball draft picks tend to be better than lower picks, consider the following points: Historical data shows that higher picks generally have better career statistics. Top picks often come from elite college programs or high school talent, indicating higher potential. Teams invest more resources in scouting and evaluating higher draft picks. Higher picks usually receive larger signing bonuses, attracting more commitment to development. Success rates for higher picks in reaching the majors are significantly higher than for lower picks. However, there are notable exceptions where lower picks have outperformed higher ones." Just lose baby...just lose!
  9. Yes Fire BresLOW and get a GM who actually knows what he is doing. . PAY FOR top talent on the FA market. Make trades that are likely to help the team. And PAY FOR the talent we already have to stay put while not handing out stupid extensions to players of questionable value. Cut bait with the deadwood on the team immediately. Id make an excellent GM I think.
  10. It’s kinda silly to deny that the higher the draft pick the better the chance of choosing a more talented player. It’s why there is a draft order rather than all teams just picking a number out of a hat. Is it a guaranteed that if you have a high draft pick you’ll get a top talent? Of course not. It’s a matter of odds. The higher the pick the higher the likelihood that the player will contribute more. So….JUST LOSE BABY! LOSE!
  11. I’ll take my chances with a top five pick and you can take your chances with a bottom five pick. Chances are I’ll come out ahead most times.
  12. You realize that between the #1 pick and the # 30 pick there are 28 players, generally in descending levels of regarded talent. Right?
  13. No thanks. I’ll simply say that there is an order in the draft for a reason with the teams with the worst records choosing ahead of those with better records. That way the worst teams have access to the more highly regarded players eligible. Otherwise why not just make it random? You know, pick a number. This is why it’s so important to lose as many games as possible for the rest of the year. You know, TANK. It’s a lost season anyway so it’s best to plan for the future.
  14. Wrongaybe it’s a crapshoot between # 10 and # 15, but getting a top five pick has a higher likelihood of choosing a player with more talent than a #20. So LOSE BABY LOSE!
  15. Yes! Another loss! Moving up in that draft order….it’s what is best.
  16. A ringing endorsement! I can’t take much of these bums. Only when I get bored watching the paint dry then I’ll flip on the game..
  17. Well of course! We not only need to spend a lot more money but we need to spend it wisely. That doesn’t mean nailing it every time but despite a few good moves BresLOW has sucked at his job. He’ll be gone after the season is over
  18. At the very least he shouldn’t lie to our faces about his priorities. The Celtics not only make the playoffs nearly every year but are almost always in serious contention for a ring. The Flops are almost always in contention for last place-lately. How many times in the past 7 years have they finished last? A: this year will make it four last place finishes in 7 years. Here you go: https://www.boston.com/sports/boston-red-sox/2026/06/19/red-sox-record-2026/
  19. The Flops are by far the worst franchise in New England. I don’t think I’d mind the fact that Henry is a cheapskate if they were competitive in most years. They aren’t. They finish LAST with disgusting regularity. Look at the other New England franchises: the Patriots were in the Superbowl last year after one year of 3-13. The Bruins made the playoffs this year during a rebuilding year. The Celtics also made the playoffs and do so almost every year. Henry lies to the fans about prioritizing winning and is 23rd in revenue invested in player salaries. This franchise stinks and deserves to be booed at the games if not boycotted.
  20. This is from an article in Forbes dated Jan of this year. The data is from 2025 and this year. ”The Boston Red Sox and Chicago Cubs, though occupants of urban ballparks with small capacities, realized $574 and $584 million, respectively, but maintained payrolls of $242 million and $213 million, placing 23rd and 26th, respectively in the ratio of revenues versus expenditures.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschlossberg/2026/01/11/study-shows-11-teams-spent-at-least-half-their-income-on-payroll/ Henry is still at #23. Cheap SOB. SELL THE TEAM!
  21. Exactly. It’s a measure of the commitment of the owners to prioritizing winning over profits. And I don’t have more recent data on the subject so I’m using what I have. Current data could be a higher or a lower percentage of revenue spent on salaries. The available data proves that Henry is more committed to making money than investing it in the team (which is his prerogative) while he lies about it to the fan base. That’s why the fans at a recent game were chanting “sell the team”. And he should. We deserve better.
×
×
  • Create New...